Acceleration of car on a gradient

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of a car on a gradient, given its mass, driving force, and frictional force. The problem involves understanding forces acting on the car both on a flat surface and when climbing an incline with an 8-degree gradient.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the effects of gravity and friction on the car's acceleration on an incline. Questions arise about the components of gravitational force acting along the incline and the net force on the car.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on analyzing forces using free body diagrams and suggest focusing on components of weight. There is acknowledgment of the complexity introduced by friction and gravity, with various interpretations of how these forces interact on an incline.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the ambiguity regarding the type of friction involved and its relevance to the problem. There is a suggestion that the friction value given may not accurately reflect real-world conditions, leading to differing opinions on its impact on the solution.

Molly1235
Messages
77
Reaction score
4
"What is the acceleration of a car of mass 1200kg, when the driving force on it is 4000N and the total frictional force on it is 900N?

What is the acceleration of this car climbing a hill with a gradient of 8 degrees?"

I got the first part, as obviously a= f/m, resultant force is 3100, and 3100/1200 = 2.6 ms^-2.

But I'm really not sure how to approach the second part...can anyone give me some clues??

Thanks!
Molly :-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When the car is on the hill that makes an 8 degree angle with the horizontal, now both gravity and friction is working against the driving force, so its acceleration will be less. What is the component of the gravity force along the incline? What is the net force acting on the car?
 
I found the vertical component to be 125N??
 
Last edited:
There is the normal push from the inclined plane, which will be different than for horizontal plane.
So the friction will be slightly different too.
The largest effect comes from the tangential (along the ramp) component of the weight.
 
nasu said:
There is the normal push from the inclined plane, which will be different than for horizontal plane.
So the friction will be slightly different too.
The largest effect comes from the tangential (along the ramp) component of the weight.

Ok that really confused me...I'm sorry! :(
 
Forget about force triangles. Choose the x-axis as the axis parallel to incline, and the y-axis as the axis perpendicular to the incline. Assume friction force is 900 N. Draw free body diagram of car, identify all forces acting, and apply F_net = ma in x direction. Be sure to correctly determine componets of the weight in the chosen x and y directions. See here for a brief tutorial:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mincl.html
 
nasu said:
There is the normal push from the inclined plane, which will be different than for horizontal plane.
So the friction will be slightly different too.
The largest effect comes from the tangential (along the ramp) component of the weight.

I think you can safely ignore any change in friction; the given friction value must pertain to losses in the drive train and perhaps air resistance. The given value for friction is certainly not enough to transmit the driving force to the road, so some unspecified static friction (between tires and road) is responsible for that and one can assume it is sufficient for all cases.
 
You are making it too complicated. This is not a real situation analysis but a school textbook problem. I agree that it is not clear what kind of friction is the one given and it does not matter for the first part of the problem.
Anyway, even assuming that it is some sort of kinetic friction, you can ignore the change on the ramp because it's second order in the angle whereas the tangential component of the weight is first order.
 
I've got it now! Got the acceleration as 1.2 ms^-2 which matches the book - thanks guys! :-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
55
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K