Accounting for Cosmological Expansion in Distance Measurements

AI Thread Summary
Cosmological expansion significantly impacts distance measurements for distant objects like quasars, which have high redshifts and originate from early cosmic times. When calculating distances, it's essential to consider how the universe's size has changed over billions of years, affecting the light's journey to Earth. The discussion highlights the need for understanding concepts such as co-moving coordinates, luminosity distance, and proper distance to accurately assess these measurements. Different cosmological models yield varying expansion rates, influenced by factors like the radiation-dominated and matter-dominated eras. For further exploration, "Introduction to Cosmology" by A. Liddle is recommended as a valuable resource.
Brantoc
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Some objects, Quasars for example have extremely high redshifts, and come from a time long past, and place far away. When determining distance on such large scales, how do you also factor in the cosmological expansion of the universe, meaning 10 billion years ago the universe was much smaller than today, the light would be stretched over time as the universe expands.

In some respects, if we see an object that is very old, were we really this far away when the light was emitted, and how far are we away today? do you assume consistent expansion, or did it once expand faster and today is it slowing?

Does someone have an example equation/result from a distant object?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Things you could read about:

co-moving coordinates
co-moving distance
luminosity distance
diameter distance
proper distance

The expansion is different in each cosmological model
and it can also vary with time within the model itself.
For example you can distinguish between radiation
dominated era and matter dominated era and then
obtain different functions for the expansion.

The book that I would suggest would be
"Introduction to Cosmology" by A. Liddle.

---
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top