Accounting for Water Vapor Condensation in Charles' Law Experiment Measurements

  • Thread starter Thread starter sunflowerzz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the impact of water vapor condensation on measurements in a Charles' Law experiment. It highlights that as the temperature decreases, water vapor condenses, which can affect the volume of gas and thus the water level observed in the dropper. Participants clarify that the question asks for an estimation of the significance of this condensation relative to the primary effects of the experiment. Understanding the equilibrium between liquid water and vapor is crucial, as it influences the number of moles of gas and the partial pressures involved. Correcting for these changes is essential to accurately test Charles' Law in this context.
sunflowerzz
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Background information: I did an experiment trying to support the validity of Charles' Law - we put a plastic dropper in a container and submerged it in salty water and then put it in the freezer. We watched the water level rise in the plastic dropper.

The question is: since we know that air contains water vapour which condenses in cold temperature, can you estimate the significance of this condensation on your measurements?


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I'm just not sure what this means? I know that the change in the water column is due to the combined change of the volume of air inside the dropper and the volume of the plastic dropper itself (which I found to be 6 mL)

But I'm not sure how that helps me? Is there supposed to be a numerical answer or just an explanation?

So, air contains water vapour that condenses in cold temperature - which means it changes from a gaseous state to a liquid state - does that mean my water level might not be from the salty water that it is submerged in? That is, part of it could come from the condensation of the water vapour in the air?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sunflowerzz said:
So, air contains water vapour that condenses in cold temperature - which means it changes from a gaseous state to a liquid state - does that mean my water level might not be from the salty water that it is submerged in? That is, part of it could come from the condensation of the water vapour in the air?

Yes.
 
voko said:
Yes.

Is that all the question was asking? Just saying that additional water could have come from the water vapour in the air? That's the only significance?

It feels like there should be more to it?!
 
sunflowerzz said:
Is that all the question was asking? Just saying that additional water could have come from the water vapour in the air? That's the only significance?

It feels like there should be more to it?!

The question is asking "estimate the significance". That is, how much water that could be and how that compares with the primary effect under the experiment.
 
In the experiments you are doing, the water vapor pressure within the gas is always in equilibrium with the liquid water at the temperature of the system. When you raise the temperature, some of the liquid water evaporates and raises the number of moles of gas; when you lower the temperature, some of the water vapor in the gas condenses, which lowers the number of moles of gas. Charles' law is based on assuming that the number of moles of gas is constant. So you need to figure out how to correct for the change in the number of moles of gas when you change the temperature.

More importantly, the partial pressure of the air is changing, even though the total pressure of the gas is constant. The partial pressure of the air within the gas plus the partial pressure of the water water vapor within the gas adds up to the total pressure of the gas. When water condenses out, the partial pressure of the water within the gas decreases, and the partial pressure of air within the gas increases. If you apply the full ideal gas law to the air within the gas, you can readily calculate the correction factor you need to test Charles' law for this experiment.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top