Acidity and the bond energy paradox in ethane, ethene, ethyne

AI Thread Summary
Ethyne exhibits higher acidity than ethene and ethane due to its sp hybridized carbon, resulting in a more polar C-H bond that facilitates proton release. The confusion arises from the relationship between bond energy and acidity; while weaker C-H bonds typically indicate higher acidity, the bond energy does not directly correlate with the energy required to abstract a proton. The bond energy for C-H bonds is defined through homolytic cleavage rather than ionic processes. Consequently, the bond energy analysis does not straightforwardly explain the observed acidity trends. Understanding this distinction clarifies the apparent contradiction in the bond energy and acidity relationship for these hydrocarbons.
Krushnaraj Pandya
Gold Member
Messages
697
Reaction score
73

Homework Statement


Compare bond energy of ethane/ene/yne

2. The attempt at a solution
Comparing their acidity, ethyne has sp hybridized C so more polar CH bond, therefore H+ can be released easily. Therefore acidity order is ethyne>ethene>ethane which means CH bond is weakest in ethyne and so has lowest bond energy but this is in fact reversed, I'm very confused regarding this apparent contradictions between two known facts. I'd appreciate some help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which bond energy? CC or CH?
 
Borek said:
Which bond energy? CC or CH?
CH, sorry for the ambiguity
 
The bond energy is not the energy required to abstract a proton.
I'm pretty sure anything you see quoted as the CH bond energy in ethane, for example, is defined by
C2H6 → 2C + 6H ΔH = E(CC) + 6 E(CH)
Even if it referred to a single bond cleavage, it would be a homolytic cleavage, not ionic, i.e.
C2H6 → C6H5⋅ + H⋅
not C2H6 → C6H5- + H+
Therefore acidity is not directly related to bond energy.
 
mjc123 said:
The bond energy is not the energy required to abstract a proton.
I'm pretty sure anything you see quoted as the CH bond energy in ethane, for example, is defined by
C2H6 → 2C + 6H ΔH = E(CC) + 6 E(CH)
Even if it referred to a single bond cleavage, it would be a homolytic cleavage, not ionic, i.e.
C2H6 → C6H5⋅ + H⋅
not C2H6 → C6H5- + H+
Therefore acidity is not directly related to bond energy.
isn't a weaker bond CH bond generally considered more acidic?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top