Added force in a line of people pushing

  • Thread starter Thread starter pkguy57
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Line
AI Thread Summary
When a person pushes against a wall, the force they exert is countered by friction against the ground, maintaining equilibrium. Introducing additional people pushing from behind increases the total force applied to the wall, but the effectiveness diminishes due to losses along the line. The configuration of pushing—whether hand to shoulder or body to body—does not significantly alter the force transfer to the wall. The first person can theoretically hold back a larger group due to the cumulative force being distributed through the line, but practical losses mean that adding more people has diminishing returns. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities of force transfer in a line of people pushing against a stationary object.
pkguy57
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
If a person is pushing against a wall with his hands and he has a line of people behing him with their hands on the shoulders of the person in front of them pushing, does the force travel all the way to the wall? This is with a steady pushing force, not a sudden impact force. Would it make a difference if they were body to body instead of hand to shoulder?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start with one person pushing.

There are two opposing horizontal forces acting, maintaining the equilibrium of that person, considered as a free body.

Reaction from wall = Friction against the ground

Now introduce a second person, pushing in the same direction as the first.
Again consider the free body equilibrium of the first person.

Reaction from wall = Friction + Push from Second Person

R = F + P
 
Assuming people with rigid arms :P
 
There would be losses all along the line. For instance, there would be almost no difference in effect upon the wall between 100 people pushing or merely 99.
 
The reasons I ask are:
1) I remember reading somewhere that the first person would be able to hold back 100 people pushing against him in this configuration for some reason. But I can't explain to my son why.
2) We were watching "Finding Nemo" and discussing whether the fish all swimming down would really affect the net bringing them up. I said that unless all the force was tranfered to the net, a fish swimming in the middle or the back of the school would not make a difference.
 
Last edited:
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top