Adding Radius of Gyration values?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the radius of gyration for a tire and wheel assembly. The original poster is unsure if they can simply add the individual radius of gyration values for the tire and rim, as this results in an unrealistic combined value. A response clarifies that the correct approach involves calculating the moment of inertia for each component based on their respective masses and then combining these to find the total radius of gyration. This method ensures that the resulting value remains within the physical constraints of the tire's dimensions. The poster acknowledges the advice and plans to implement the suggested calculations.
Nugget12
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi There
I am doing a little test program for some tire testing and just need to make sure I am doing something right, I am calculating the radius of gyration of my tire and wheel separately using the formulas from Dunlop http://www.dunlopaircrafttyres.com/tech_support/dunlop-engineering-data.aspx So I have a value of k for the tire and wheel, do I just add those two together to get the combined radius? I do that currently but it leaves me with a value of k that is outside the radius of the tyre, ie for a tire whose diameter is 0.36m I get a k value for the rim of 0.201 and for the tire of 0.239 so combined it comes to 0.44 which feels wrong to me. Can anyone see where I am going wrong?
Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nugget12 said:
Hi Ther
I am doing a little test program for some tire testing and just need to make sure I am doing something right, I am calculating the radius of gyration of my tire and wheel separately using the formulas from Dunlop http://www.dunlopaircrafttyres.com/tech_support/dunlop-engineering-data.aspx So I have a value of k for the tire and wheel, do I just add those two together to get the combined radius? I do that currently but it leaves me with a value of k that is outside the radius of the tyre, ie for a tire whose diameter is 0.36m I get a k value for the rim of 0.201 and for the tire of 0.239 so combined it comes to 0.44 which feels wrong to me. Can anyone see where I am going wrong?
Chris
The gyradius r is based on the mass of a rotating object and its moment of inertia about the axis of rotation, such that:

r2 = I / M

where

I - moment of inertia
M - mass of the object

Your tire and wheel probably have two different masses, so the proper calculation would be to convert the gyradius of each component to a moment of inertia, using the correct masses, add the moments together, and then calculate the gyradius of the combined assembly, like so:

Itire = Mtire*rtire2
Iwheel = Mwheel*rwheel2

Itotal = Itire + Iwheel

Mtotal = Mtire + Mwheel

rtotal = (Itotal / Mtotal)1/2
 
Many thanks for the quick reply, that looks more sensible, will give that a try. Thanks.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
18K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Back
Top