Adding resistor and capacitor in parallel

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total impedance of a circuit with two 8-ohm resistors and a 3-ohm capacitor in parallel. The correct formula for impedance is Z = (1/8 + 1/8 + 1/j3)^(-1), leading to the expected result of 1.44 + j1.92. A participant clarifies that the impedance can also be expressed as 4 ohms and 3j ohms in parallel, resulting in the equation 1/Z = 1/4 + 1/3j. The confusion arises around the numerator 12j, which is derived from multiplying 4 and 3j. The final simplified impedance is confirmed to be Z = 12j/(4 + 3j).
obsolete
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I am meant to find the total impedance across the circuit but am having trouble with one section of the circuit. This section comprises of 2 resistors and 1 capacitor in parallel.

The two resistors are 8 ohms each and the capacitor is 3 ohms. So the process is meant to be:

Z = ( 1/8 + 1/8 + 1/j3) ^(-1)

and the answer is meant to be: 1.44 + j1.92

I know it is really simple but I can't wrap my head around it at the moment and it's driving me insane! Any help much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The secytion can be written as 4 ohms and 3j ohm are in parallel. Then
1/Z = 1/4 + 1/3j
Z = 12j /( 4 + 3j) . Now rationalise the denominator and simplify.
 
Thanks rl.bhat.

I am wondering though how did you get 12j for the numerator? I'm sure it relates to 4 x 3j = 12j somehow but I'm not sure why...
 
When you add 1/4 + 1/3j you get (3j + 4)/12j. This is 1/Z. therefore
Z = 12j/(4 + 3j)
 
Thanks a lot man!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top