Additivity of Time Constants in Series RC Circuits

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the additivity of time constants in series RC circuits, specifically questioning if the time constants are additive when R1 equals R2 and tau1 is approximately equal to tau2. It is noted that solving the entire circuit is necessary to determine the composite time constant, as the circuits can load each other without a buffer amplifier. The user is utilizing impedance spectroscopy to measure capacitance, observing that the circuit behaves like two capacitors in parallel, allowing for the subtraction of a reference capacitance from the total. Despite theoretical models suggesting only one dominant time constant, experimental results indicate a sum of the two time constants, raising questions about the circuit's behavior. Clarifications on the circuit configuration and measurement methods are requested to better understand the discrepancies in results.
jjk
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know of any instance where the the time constants of two RC circuits in series is additive. It seems that when R1=R2 and tao1~tao2 this holds?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
jjk said:
Does anyone know of any instance where the the time constants of two RC circuits in series is additive. It seems that when R1=R2 and tao1~tao2 this holds?

Welcome to the PF.

What is the context of the question? In general, you need to solve the whole circuit together, to figure out what the composite time constant is. This is because the circuits load each other (when there is no buffer amp between them), which changes their individual behaviors.
 
I am trying to determine capacitance using impedance spectroscopy with two RC circuits in series with the same resistance (1Mohm) and it seems that the circuit is behaving essentially as two capacitors in parallel so that the reference capacitance (50pF) can be subtracted from the total capacitance to get the sample capacitance.
Thanks jjk or PVDF.
 
PVDF said:
Thanks jjk or PVDF.

Thank you to yourself? :rolleyes:
 
I am trying to determine capacitance using impedance spectroscopy with two RC circuits in series with the same resistance (1Mohm) and it seems that the circuit is behaving essentially as two capacitors in parallel so that the reference capacitance (50pF) can be subtracted from the total capacitance to get the sample capacitance.
 
That last post (#3) should have been the same as #5 "not thanks to myself" and I don't know what the probelm is, I am also having problems logging back in hence the multiple usernames.
 
CNC said:
That last post (#3) should have been the same as #5 "not thanks to myself" and I don't know what the probelm is, I am also having problems logging back in hence the multiple usernames.

Yes, the PF software is having some issues at the moment. We'll clean up the multiple user names later (it's against the PF rules, but understandable at the moment).

On your question, write out the equations and solve them to see what the effect of the two series RC circuits is...
 
Using a Voigt model to model the circuit indicates that I should only see one time constant the greater of the two, any reason why experimentally I am seeing the sum of the two time constants?
 
CNC said:
Using a Voigt model to model the circuit indicates that I should only see one time constant the greater of the two, any reason why experimentally I am seeing the sum of the two time constants?

Can you please post some of this work that you've been doing? Thanks.
 
  • #10
The circuitry I have been using is --RC--RC-- where the two RC circuits are in parallel, and the Z'=∑R_k/((1+(ωCR)^2 )) and Z" = -ω∑(CR^2)/((1+(ωCR)^2 )), however upon using this to model the data ie C1=50pF and C2=100pF, R1=R2=1Mohm and sweeping frequency 0.1-100 kHz it is an RC semicircle but the max. gives a tao = 0.1 ms (R2*C2), the experimental data on the other hand, upon subtracting the reference tao C1*R1 from the total tao I get 0.11 ms. I am only trying to determine C2 and I get the right C when subtracting C(total) from C1 but circuit analysis wise I don't see why this works?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
CNC said:
The circuitry I have been using is --RC--RC-- where the two RC circuits are in parallel, and the Z'=∑R_k/((1+(ωCR)^2 )) and Z" = -ω∑(CR^2)/((1+(ωCR)^2 )), however upon using this to model the data ie C1=50pF and C2=100pF, R1=R2=1Mohm and sweeping frequency 0.1-100 kHz it is an RC semicircle but the max. gives a tao = 0.1 ms (R2*C2), the experimental data on the other hand, upon subtracting the reference tao C1*R1 from the total tao I get 0.11 ms. I am only trying to determine C2 and I get the right C when subtracting C(total) from C1 but circuit analysis wise I don't see why this works?

I'm sorry to be dense, but what do you mean by "the two RC circuits are in parallel"? Where are you injecting your signal, and where are you measuring the output signal. And what is the source impedance of your signal generator?
 
  • #12
I meant to say that the two parallel RC circuits are in series and I'm injecting the signal into one side and measuring the output signal using counter eletrodes all hook together in a coaxial harness, and the source impedance of the generator is ~50 ohms.
 
Back
Top