I Adiabatic irreversible process vs adiabatic reversible

AI Thread Summary
In an adiabatic irreversible process, a thermodynamic system experiences a positive change in entropy as it moves from state A to state B. This change in entropy, denoted as S_g, indicates that heat must be transferred to the surroundings. In contrast, a reversible adiabatic process between the same states cannot occur without heat flow, as the entropy change ΔS must be accounted for. Therefore, if ΔS is greater than zero, some heat transfer is necessary during the reversible process. This understanding reinforces the relationship between entropy, heat flow, and the nature of thermodynamic processes.
cianfa72
Messages
2,811
Reaction score
298
TL;DR Summary
adiabatic irreversible vs adiabatic reversible processes between two given thermodynamic states
Hi,

consider an adiabatic irreversible process carrying a thermodynamic system from initial state A to final state B: this process is accompanied by a positive change in system entropy (call it ##S_g##). Then consider a reversible process between the same initial and final system state. Such reversible process could be adiabatic itself ?

I believe not because the exceeding entropy between final and initial state (that are the same regardless the process) has to be transferred out to the surrounding by means of heat "crossing" the boundary of the system itself.

Does it make sense ? Thanks
 
  • Like
Likes atyy and Chestermiller
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. Since ##\Delta S = \int_A^B \frac{dQ_{rev}}{T}##, if ΔS > 0 then dQrev cannot be zero throughout: ie. there must be some heat flow during the reversible process from A to B

AM
 
  • Like
Likes atyy and Chestermiller
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top