Advanced calculus proof- oscillating sequences

emira
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For the sequence defined recursively as follows:

a_1 = 2, and a_(n+1) = 1/ (a_n)^2 for all n from N.



Homework Equations



So, we are supposed to use induction to first fidn if the sequence increases or decreases, and then use induction again to show if it is bounded.


The Attempt at a Solution



If one would take some terms for this sequence, it is easy to see it is oscillating...
a_1 = 2, a_2 = 1/4, a_3 = 16, a_4 = 1/256...so I am stuck trying to prove this is an oscillating sequence using induction. is there any other type of proof to use for this case, because induction seems useless in this case.

If someone has any idea, let me know please.

Thank you in advance for you help!

Emira
 
Physics news on Phys.org
so you want to show whether this sequence diverges or converges, right?

if this is the case, then from a theorem we know that: let

(a_n) be a sequence, then if we can find two subsequences from this one (b_n), (c_m) such that they don't converge at the same place, then we can conclude that the original sequence a_n diverges. So, all you need to do is let

(b_n), for, n=2k, k \in Z^+ and (c_m), m=2k+1, k\in Z^+ and prove that these two subsequences do not converge at the same place.
 
Induction isn't useless, you just have to use it wisely. a_(n+2)=a_n^4, right? The odd terms are increasing (since a1>1) and the even terms are decreasing since (a2<1). That's not to hard to show by induction, right?
 
Last edited:
Looking at even n, a2= 1/4, a4= 1/256, etc. which looks like a decreasing sequence.

Looking at odd n, a1= 2, a3= 8, etc. which looks like an increasing sequence.

You know a formula to get an+1 from an. Can you extend it to get a formula for an+2[/sup] from an? Then use induction on the even and odd subsequences.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top