Advice request - design a toy steam engine and do a pull event

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on designing a modified Mamod toy steam engine for a pull event, where the engine must pull the maximum load over a 60-inch course within five minutes. Key considerations include the choice of wheels versus tracks for traction, the efficiency of using a commercial gearbox compared to Meccano gears, and the potential benefits of a heavier flywheel. The use of miniature bearings and lubrication for the drivetrain is suggested, while variable gearing may not provide a significant advantage. Additionally, the idea of incorporating a capstan or winch is proposed to enhance pulling capabilities.
Novice One
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Advice request -- design a toy steam engine and do a pull event

Hello,

Please do forgive me if this is inappropriate use of this sight, I'm looking for general advice, any suggestions as to where I could get information and thoughts on the subject are welcome.

I've taken a challenge to build and enter a competition to modify a 'Mamod toy steam engine' and enter a pull event. The engine on one fuel fill will have to pull as much load as possible over a 5' or 60 Inch flat course, with a 5 min time limit. The cylinder assembly, burner and safety vale have to remain standard. I understand that around 2000 RPM is available.

The design apart from the above proviso's can be as outlandish / revolutionary as required. My perception of this is that this is a task around gearing. However I'm thinking in relation to other points and need answers advice and suggestions.

1 - Would this task be better performed with small wheels, larger wheels or tracks
2 - Should I use a small commercial gear box or use Meccano gears
3 - Updating the Flywheel to solid, much heavier, will that give me an advantage / benefit
4 - Should I consider using miniature bearings and lubrication on the drive train
5 - Would there be an advantage to having variable gearing / how could this be achieved?


At this time a competitor has a pull weight of around 30 Kg - on a trolley pulled by the engine, which I consider very interesting.

Again sorry if this is inappropriate

Thanks & Regards

Mark
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

1. What is the surface it needs to grip?
2. Commercial box will be more efficient.
3. Flywheel is needed if single cylinder.
4. Commercial gearbox needs bearings but final axles can be simple shafts in bushes.
5. No advantage in mechanical variable gearing. Maybe torque converter?

If the rules allow, you might consider a capstan or winch to pull the engine along the course.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Back
Top