Aerospace Nuclear Science and Technology

AI Thread Summary
The Aerospace Nuclear Science and Technology Division (ANSTD) is set to hold its inaugural topical meeting in February 2011 in Albuquerque, focusing on advancements in space nuclear technology. The meeting will facilitate discussions on NASA's initiatives for manned and unmanned missions to the Moon and Mars, emphasizing the importance of advanced power, propulsion technologies, and radiation shielding. Participants are encouraged to share ideas, particularly regarding innovative propulsion methods like ion propulsion, which could potentially create artificial magnetospheres for radiation protection. The conversation also touches on historical concepts of plasma propulsion in aviation and the challenges posed by plasma's impact on radio communications. Overall, the forum aims to foster collaboration among government, industry, and academia in the field of space nuclear activities.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,340
Reaction score
7,138
Yeah - we're still serious about this stuff.

In February 2011 the Aerospace Nuclear Science and Technology Division (ANSTD) of the American Nuclear Society (ANS) will hold its first stand-alone topical meeting in Albuquerque, NM. The momentum and positive collaborative environment established by the former Space Technologies and Applications International Forum (STAIF), last held in 2008, has been upheld by a�series of discussion forums and technical meetings sponsored by ANSTD in 2009 and 2010 (see SNSF and NETS-2009 on the Prior Meetings Page), and NETS-2011 will bring these formats together in a single venue.

Topic Areas

NASA is currently developing capabilities for unmanned and manned missions to the Moon, Mars, and beyond. Strategies implementing advanced power and propulsion technologies, as well as radiation shielding protection, will be an integral part of successful missions of these types. NETS-2011 will provide a communications network and forum for information exchange for the wide cross section of research and management personnel from government, industry, academia, and the national laboratory system that are involved in space nuclear activities. To this end, the meeting will address topics ranging from overviews of current programs and plans to detailed challenges related to space travel, as detailed in the Call for Papers.

http://anstd.ans.org/NETS2011/AboutNETS2011.htm

http://anstd.ans.org/index.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Astronuc said:
...Strategies implementing advanced power and propulsion technologies, as well as radiation shielding protection, will be an integral part of successful missions of these types...
On that:

I have been wondering if ion propulsion could solve two problems at once. Suppose the magnets that contain the plasma and propell it out the rear of the vehicle were not just mounted at the tail of the spacecraft . Instead, suppose these magnets started near the nose of the vehicle, and spread the plasma out into a thin sheet, which would progress spherically down the length of the craft before being focussed into a tight beem and forced out the back.

Would these powerfull ellectromagnets then provide an artificiall magnetosphere, and the (highly ionised) plasma, an artificiall ionosphere? I know that each would be much thinner than its natural counterpart, but they are also much more concentrated, so it seems to me they would provide at least some protection.

What I'm mainly interested in is finding out if anyone else is thinking along the same lines. Let me know if it has come up in any of the meetigns you have attended, or if it comes up in NM, would ya?
 
Sounds like a feasible approach to me, LURCH.

I was thinking of a similar idea as yours, not as radiation protection and not for spacecraft , but for aircraft. You generate the plasma at the front of the vehicle and use magnets lined along the fuselage to draw it to the rear, thus generating propulsion that would be as quiet as the wind. It turns out that the guy that started Republic Aviation, Seversky, was considering this sort of propulsion for aviation back in the mid 30's.

One problem that you will have to solve when working with plasma and ions is the disruption of radio communications.

Marlin
 
LURCH said:
On that:

I have been wondering if ion propulsion could solve two problems at once. Suppose the magnets that contain the plasma and propell it out the rear of the vehicle were not just mounted at the tail of the spacecraft . Instead, suppose these magnets started near the nose of the vehicle, and spread the plasma out into a thin sheet, which would progress spherically down the length of the craft before being focussed into a tight beem and forced out the back.

Would these powerfull ellectromagnets then provide an artificiall magnetosphere, and the (highly ionised) plasma, an artificiall ionosphere? I know that each would be much thinner than its natural counterpart, but they are also much more concentrated, so it seems to me they would provide at least some protection.

What I'm mainly interested in is finding out if anyone else is thinking along the same lines. Let me know if it has come up in any of the meetigns you have attended, or if it comes up in NM, would ya?
Took me a while to remember the name of the concept, but it has been around for about 3 decades.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_sail

NIAC Study of the Magnetic Sail
http://www.niac.usra.edu/files/library/meetings/fellows/nov99/320Zubrin.pdf

http://casa.colorado.edu/~danforth/science/magsail/magsail.html

Theory of Space Magnetic Sail Some Common Mistakes and Electrostatic MagSail*
http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0701/0701060.pdf
Alexander Bolonkin

And there was a variation on the magsail that would collect protons and possibly accelerate them, or induce fusion, which would have to be the (p,B) reaction.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
502K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top