Air Bubbles and Terminal Velocity-> why is my answer wrong? (all work shown)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the terminal velocity of air bubbles rising from a scuba diver, with specific parameters like bubble radius and water viscosity provided. The user initially calculates terminal velocity using Stoke's Law but arrives at an incorrect value of 0.22 m/s instead of the expected 2.2 m/s. Participants suggest checking calculations and calculator settings, highlighting the importance of accurate input for variables like radius, gravitational acceleration, and viscosity. Additionally, there is confusion regarding the derivation of the mass term involving 4/3πr³, which relates to the volume of the bubble and its density. The conversation emphasizes the need for careful calculation and understanding of the physics involved.
afg_91320
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Air Bubbles and Terminal Velocity--> why is my answer wrong? (all work shown)

Homework Statement


Air bubbles of 1.0mm radius are rising from a scuba diver to the surface of the sea. Assume a
water temp of 20C.
a) If viscosity of water = 1.0 X 10-3 Pa.s, what is the terminal
velocity of the bubbles
b) What is the largest rate of the pressure change tolerable for the diver
according to this rule?
(Rule is divers cannot rise faster than their air bubbles when riding to the surface
* helps avoid rapid pressure changes that cause the bends)


Homework Equations


r = 1.0mm = 1.0 x 10-3m
T= 20C <--I have no idea what to do with this!
\eta= 1.0 x 10-3 (viscosity of water)
\rho= 1000kg/m3
im assuming density of water will be needed


The Attempt at a Solution



With terminal velocity you produce the right drag so the net force is 0.
And with the air bubbles i know that the terminal velocity is upward

first i set Fnet = 0
and its in the y directions, so
Fy= FD + FB=0
FD= 6\pi\etarv (v=velocity)
^This is known as Stoke's Law

next i solved for vt v = vt

vt= mass water(g)/ 6\pi\etar
=4/3\pir3g(\rhowater/(6\pi\etar)

next i simplified it by taking out pi and
=4/3r2g(\rhowater/(6\eta)

and i got .22
but the answer is suppose to be 2.2 m/s upward-WHAT did i do wrong?

please help me!
thanks.

NOTE the greek letters ARE NOT in subsrcipt. i don't know why it does that-but it is not an exponent.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Check your calculations. Using your final equation, I do get 2.2 m/s.
 


i have been trying it all day
and just did it again.
now I am getting 2177777

how did u put in ur calc?
 


I put 1E-3 for r, 9.8 for g, 1000 for rho, and 1E-3 for eta. If you don't know how to use your calculator, I can't help you there; my calculator is likely different from yours, and all I can suggest is to watch how the calculator responds to each key you press to make sure it's doing what you want it to.
 


hmm i did the same thing-ill check my settings then.
oh well.
the important thing is that my setup for the prblm was right! =)
 


I'm working on the same problem, but I don't understand where the 4/3(Pi)(r^3) came from. I'm not sure how to sub density for the masses (which aren't given).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top