Air velocity from small aperture

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on designing a drying mechanism using a vacuum pump to direct air through a narrow aperture for window drying. The user questions whether they can assume the airflow is incompressible for calculations, noting that their estimated outlet velocity is 107 mph, which is below the compressibility threshold. They reference the high-speed air used in Dyson hand dryers and express concern about the effectiveness of their setup compared to that. Concerns about pump power limitations and friction losses when forcing air through a small orifice are raised, suggesting that these factors could impact performance. The conversation concludes with a query about the advantages of using air drying versus traditional methods like scrapers.
pdfmech
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello. I am designing a drying mechanism for a window. Basically air is taken from the atmosphere by a vacuum pump and is ducted to a small width aperture. The aperture would be 18 inches long and as thin as we can make it (millimeters). Inspiration for this design is from the Dyson hand dryer which uses 400 mph sheets of air to blast water off hands. My question is when performing the calculations can i assume that flow is incompressible. I imagine i can not but this doe not have to be way too precise. I just need to know if it will remove water from the window. Calculations using conservation of mass with incompressible, uniform flow say that with my given vacuum pump the air velocity at the outlet will be 107 mph. I would appreciate any guidance in these calculations..
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
At 107 mph the air can certainly be considered incompressible. As a rule of thumb you don't have to worry about compressibility until the velocity is around Mach 0.3 which is somewhere around 220 mph think.
 
How are you calculating whether or not you can remove the water from the window?
 
RandomGuy88 said:
How are you calculating whether or not you can remove the water from the window?
Thats a good question. The velocity from the hand dryer i mentioned was 400 mph and I figured a fraction of that would be good enough. The pump i found outputs 93 cubic feet per minute and i don't want to spend much more money on a pump than the $90 that cost. But i do need to do some more research/experiments on that.
 
Just as a warning, a pump only has so much power, which translates to so much energy it can effectively put into a flow. When you squeeze that flow through a much tinier orifice than the pump is designed for, you will have more loss due to friction and thus most likely less mass flow.
 
Out of curiosity, may I ask why you have chosen to use this kind of approach? I am wondering what the benefit would be of using a air blaster rather than the simple scraper!
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Back
Top