Algebraic integers of a finite extension of Q has an integral basis

learningphysics
Homework Helper
Messages
4,097
Reaction score
7
I already know that this is true for galois extensions of Q... how do you extend this result to any finite extension of Q?

I was thinking given a finite extension of Q, call it K... find a galois extension that includes the finite extension, call it L... then somehow use the fact that the ring of algebraic integers of L has an integral basis to show that the integers of K must have an integral basis.

By integral basis, I mean that there is a finite set of elements in the ring w1,w2,w3...wn such that an element in the ring can be written in the form a1w1+a2w2+a3w3+...anwn

where a1,a2,a3,...an belong to Z.

I'd appreciate any help. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
learningphysics said:
By integral basis, I mean that there is a finite set of elements in the ring w1,w2,w3...wn such that an element in the ring can be written in the form a1w1+a2w2+a3w3+...anwn

where a1,a2,a3,...an belong to Z.
Written uniquely, you mean.
 
Hurkyl said:
Written uniquely, you mean.

yes, you're right. it must be unique.
 
this is not my forte, but doesn't finitely generated as an algebra plus integral imply finite as a module?

and a finite module over Z, is a direct sum of free ones and finite cyclic ones, but your module is torsion free hen ce free.

i do not see what galois has to do with it, unkless i am missing some hypotheses here.

i.e. take a finite field extension of Q, then take the elements which are integral over Z, i guess you need to know that is a finitely generated Z algebra to use my argument. is that the missing step?

dummitt and foote page 697 use your idea of embedding in a galois extension and taking traces to prove finite generation.
 
Last edited:
Hi mathwonk. This is an exercise from "Elements of Abstract Algebra" by Allan Clark. Almost at the end of it. :)

He gives a proof that a Galois extension of Q has a finite basis where the coefficients can be taken over Z... so this is what a Z-module is correct? Module is analogous to a vector space, but taking coefficients from a ring?

Then as an exercise he asks to prove that any finite extension of Q is a Z-module (he doesn't use the term module though). That's the reason I'm trying to take this approach.

He hasn't introduced modules in the text. He's about to introduce trace and norm in the next part...
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top