Algebraic Multiplicity of an Eigenvalue

vish_maths
Messages
60
Reaction score
1
Please have a look at the attached images.I am attempting a proof for the statement : The algebraic multiplicity of an eigen value λ is equal to dim null [T - λ I] dim V.

Please advise me on how to move ahead. Apparently, I am at the final inference required for a proof but unable to move ahead. Thank you very much for your help in this regard.

Reference : To know how results (2) and (3) in the images come, you may please have a look at this ebook - pg 165, http://fetweb.ju.edu.jo/staff/EE/jrahhal/PDF/sc%20-%20Linear%20Algebra%20Done%20Right.pdf
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    55.1 KB · Views: 570
  • 2.png
    2.png
    42.7 KB · Views: 586
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
In my experience, the definition you gave is of the _geometric _ multiplicity, not the algebraic one. The two multiplicities may or may not coincide.
 
WWGD said:
In my experience, the definition you gave is of the _geometric _ multiplicity, not the algebraic one. The two multiplicities may or may not coincide.
Thank you for the answer. The notes which I have say that the number of times λ appears on the diagonal of an upper triangular matrix is equal to dim null [T - λ I] dim V. Do you think there is error in this statement as well?"

I have actually attempted the proof to prove this statement. Sorry about incorrectly saying it equal to algebraic multiplicity
 
Ah, sorry, I did not see the exponent dimV in your post , at first. In my experience, the geometric multiplicity of ## \lambda ## is the dimension of null## [T- \lambda I] ##. The algebraic multiplicity of ## \lambda ## is the multiplicity of the exponent of ##\lambda## in the factorization of ## A-cI ##.
 
Last edited:
No problem :) . Do you think I made a good attempt at the proof? I just think i got stuck in the last stage of the proof
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top