Am I missing something with exponential Fourier series?

slashrulez
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm in a signal processing class, and I'm having some trouble with complex numbers. As an example, I've attached a pretty simple question about an exponential Fourier series.

I don't find these questions particularly hard, it just takes me ridiculously long to do them. I mean, after I take the integral, it literally took me 10 minutes to actually figure out how to get the general expression for different n values and whatnot. It just seems like it should be much easier, so I'm wondering if there's some kind of shortcut I'm missing.

My current method is pretty slow, and I just rewrite everything in trigonometric form and work from there. I can't think of any other way to do it, but it takes an awful long time. When I look at the work in that example, I don't really know what's going on. I don't know how they go to from the integral to that expression in one step, and I don't even know what the symbol attached to the npi/2 is.

Can anyone help me out? Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Whoops, it looks like I forgot to attach the picture
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    20.5 KB · Views: 472
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top