Ampere's law vs. Biot-Savart law

AI Thread Summary
Ampere's law is applicable primarily in situations with high symmetry, such as straight wires, sheets of current, and solenoids, but it has limitations in arbitrary configurations. Biot-Savart law is considered more fundamental and can be applied to a wider range of scenarios, including those lacking symmetry. Ampere's law can be derived from Biot-Savart law, but it is not suitable for short wires or solenoids where the magnetic field is not uniform. There is a discussion about a specific calculation related to Biot-Savart law, suggesting that a "pi" term may have been incorrectly included. Overall, understanding the contexts in which each law applies is crucial for accurate magnetic field calculations.
kasse
Messages
383
Reaction score
1
What's the difference? Is Ampere's law a special case (when the conductor carrying the current is a straight wire?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Biot-Savart law is the more important and fundamental one. Ampere's law can be derived from it but can only be used in some very specific situations, but not only in straight wire cases. It can be applied to sheets of current, solenoids, etc.
 
Mephisto said:
Biot-Savart law is the more important and fundamental one. Ampere's law can be derived from it but can only be used in some very specific situations, but not only in straight wire cases. It can be applied to sheets of current, solenoids, etc.

OK, thanks. Btw, isn't the last calculation wrong here: http://planetphysics.org/encyclopedia/QuarterLoopExampleOfBiotSavartLaw.html

There should be no "pi" in the answer if I'm right.
 
Ampere's law is usually only applied to problems that have certain symmetry.

For example, a straight wire is symmetric about it's center axis, a sheet is symmetric, a solenoid is symmetric, etc...

Some arbitrary wire is not symmetric however and Ampere's law can generally not be used there.

Also if you only have a short solenoid or wire for example (a short length in relation to it's radius) then Ampere's law does not give a very accurate answer either, because it ignores the fact that the magnetic field lines curve away from the wire at the ends; it assumes the magnetic field is nearly constant.About the link, if the calculation up until the integral is correct then yes, the pi should cancel indeed. I haven't checked what they did before that though, but I think it's correct (so the pi is wrong).
 
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...
Back
Top