Ampere's law: what if we have a magnetic field but no current

AI Thread Summary
A magnetic field surrounding a closed path typically indicates the presence of a current, but in the absence of current, the concept of displacement current arises. However, in the context of a magnetic dipole, the magnetic field is associated with bound currents rather than displacement currents. Solid cylindrical magnets exhibit bound magnetic surface currents that are analogous to solenoid currents. These concepts are detailed in Griffiths' E&M textbook, where the relationship between magnetization and current density is established. Ultimately, displacement current is specifically related to changing electric fields, such as in charging capacitors or electromagnetic waves.
Felipe Lincoln
Gold Member
Messages
99
Reaction score
11
If I have a magnetic field describing a closed path it means that this closed path is surrounding a current, right? But if I have no current, is it the displacement current ?
I'm thinking of a magnetic dipole, its magnetic field describes closed paths from its north to south pole, so is there a displacement current surrounding the longitudinal axis of a magnetic dipole?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Felipe Lincoln said:
I'm thinking of a magnetic dipole, its magnetic field describes closed paths from its north to south pole, so is there a displacement current surrounding the longitudinal axis of a magnetic dipole?
No, it isn’t a displacement current. It is what is called a bound current.
 
  • Like
Likes Felipe Lincoln and Charles Link
A single loop of current is a magnetic dipole.## \\ ## In the case of a solid cylindrical magnet of finite length, in one model used to describe the magnetic effects, the magnetism ## \vec{M} ## in the material results in bound magnetic surface currents which are geometrically equivalent to the currents of a solenoid.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale and Felipe Lincoln
Wow, never heard of it.
Is it also given by ## \epsilon_0\dfrac{\partial \Phi_E}{\partial t}## ?
 
The magnetic surface currents are presented in Griffiths' E&M textbook. He presents them so quickly, without extra emphasis, that I think many students overlook them. He does a derivation involving the vector potential ## A ## for an arbitrary distribution of magnetic dioples, and then at the very end, he shows this is equivalent to having bulk currents with current density ## J_m=\nabla \times M ##, along with surface current per unit length ## K_m=M \times \hat{n} ##. ## \\ ## (i.e. you get the same ## A ## as you would from current sources that are the bulk current from the magnetization along with the bound surface currents, because ## A(x)=\frac{\mu_o}{4 \pi} \int \frac{J(x')}{|x-x'|} \, d^3x' ## from current sources ## J ##). ## \\ ## See also: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/magnetic-field-of-a-ferromagnetic-cylinder.863066/
and
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/permanent-magnets-ferromagnetism-magnetic-surface-currents/ ## \\ ## And no, what you have shown ## I_D=\mu_o \epsilon_o \frac{\partial{\Phi_E}}{\partial{t}}## is the displacement current that can be found in a capacitor that is charging, as well as in transverse electromagnetic waves.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Felipe Lincoln
Ok, thanks for the answer.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top