Amplitude and Period of Oscillation from Collision

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves a 2.00-kg object attached to a spring, which is struck by another 2.00-kg object, resulting in a combined mass of 4.00 kg. The amplitude of the resulting oscillations is calculated to be 0.300 m, while the period of oscillation is determined to be 1.26 s. The speed of the combined mass after the collision is found to be 1.5 m/s, not the initial 3 m/s. The equations used include T=2π√(m/k) for the period and energy conservation to find amplitude. The calculations confirm the correct values for amplitude and period post-collision.
bob tran
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 2.00-kg object is attached to an ideal massless horizontal spring of spring constant 100.0 N/m and is at rest on a frictionless horizontal table. The spring is aligned along the x-axis and is fixed to a peg in the table. Suddenly this mass is struck by another 2.00-kg object traveling along the x-axis at 3.00 m/s, and the two masses stick together. What are the amplitude and period of the oscillations that result from this collision?
Correct Answer: A=0.300 m, T=1.26 s

2. Homework Equations

<br /> T=2\pi \sqrt{\dfrac{m}{k}}\\<br /> \dfrac{1}{2}mv^2=\dfrac{1}{2}kA^2<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


<br /> m=2 + 2 = 4 \ \texttt{kg}\\<br /> \dfrac{1}{2}mv^2=\dfrac{1}{2}kA^2\\<br /> A=\sqrt{\dfrac{mv^2}{k}}\\<br /> A=\sqrt{\dfrac{(4)(3)^2}{100}}=0.600 \ \texttt{m}\\<br /> T=2\pi \sqrt{\dfrac{m}{k}}\\<br /> T=2\pi \sqrt{\dfrac{4}{100}}\\<br /> T=1.26 \ \texttt{s}<br />
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the speed of the combined mass after the collision? Is it still 3m/s?
 
JeremyG said:
What is the speed of the combined mass after the collision? Is it still 3m/s?
Thanks!
<br /> v=\dfrac{m_1 v_1 + m_2 v_2}{m_1 + m_2} = 1.5 \dfrac{\texttt{m}}{\texttt{s}}\\<br /> A=\sqrt{\dfrac{(4)(1.5)^2}{100}}=0.300 \ \texttt{m}<br />
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top