Amplitude Modulation of a wave

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding the derivation of amplitude modulation expressions in a textbook. The user initially questions the representation of the modulated signal, believing it should be a simple sum of the carrier and modulating signals. They later discover that the textbook uses a nonlinear approach to produce the modulated wave, which involves mixing frequencies through a square law device. This realization clarifies the discrepancy between their assumption and the textbook's explanation. Ultimately, the user concludes that the issue stemmed from the textbook presenting results before the necessary derivation.
Prashasti
Messages
63
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I am utterly confused. When I was reading my textbook , I found something unacceptable.


While deriving an expression for a modulated wave,
It's been given that
"A sinusoidal carrier wave can be represented as c (t) = Ac sin
(ωt + Φ)
where c (t) is the signal strength of the carrier wave.
Let m (t) = Am sinωmt represent the message or the modulating signal.
The modulated signal cm (t) can be written as
cm= (Ac+Amsin ωmt) sin ωct

I wonder how's it possible! Shouldn't it be cm (t) = Acsin ωct + Am sinωmt ?

But then I made an adhoc assumption - which was not satisfactory - but I thought it could be justified from a more rigorous application of mathematics. So, I continued reading

On the next page, I found something in contrast to my "assumption".
In the topic "Production of amplitude modulated wave" -
According to my textbook "Here the modulating signal Am
sinωmt is added to the carrier signal Acsinωt to produce the signal x (t). This signal x (t) = Am sinωmt + Ac sin ωct is passed through a square law device."

Now this equation for x (t) is different from the one which was used (in the textbook) earlier.
What even is happening?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If the sum of two signals of different frequencies ω1 and ω2 is the input of a linear network, the output would be again the sum of two signals with the same frequencies.
Using a nonlinear device, one, for example, that produces the square of the input, it will "mix" the frequencies. Expand (Asin(ω1t) + Bsin(ω2t ))2, what do you get? ( there will be components with frequencies of 2ω1, 2ω2, ω12, ω12).
Semiconductor diodes, transistors have nonlinear characteristics, and can be used for "mixing frequencies"
 
  • Like
Likes Prashasti
ehild said:
If the sum of two signals of different frequencies ω1 and ω2 is the input of a linear network, the output would be again the sum of two signals with the same frequencies.
Using a nonlinear device, one, for example, that produces the square of the input, it will "mix" the frequencies. Expand (Asin(ω1t) + Bsin(ω2t ))2, what do you get? ( there will be components with frequencies of 2ω1, 2ω2, ω12, ω12).
Semiconductor diodes, transistors have nonlinear characteristics, and can be used for "mixing frequencies"

Ok.
So, the problem lies in the arrangement of all that in my textbook..
 
They mentioned the result before deducing the expression for the same.
I got it!
Thanks!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top