Amplitude of damped mass-spring system

lampCable
Messages
22
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Given the IVP
<br /> \ddot{r}+\dot{r}+20r=0\\<br /> r(0) = 0.8\\<br /> \dot{r}(0) = 0<br />
for the length of an oscillating spring (damped), we find that the general solution is
<br /> r=e^{-0.5t}[0.8\cos(\sqrt{19.75}t)+\frac{0.4}{\sqrt{19.75}}\sin(\sqrt{19.75}t)]<br />
and I wish to find the curve bounding the upper part of the solution, i.e. the amplitude of the oscillations.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand that if
<br /> r=e^{-0.5t}0.8\cos(\sqrt{19.75}t)<br />
for example, then the amplitude would be obtained by removing the cosine factor, since e^{-0.5t}0.8 correspond to the amplitude and \cos(\sqrt{19.75}t) corresponds to how fast the spring is oscillating. But how does one do when there are two oscillating terms as above?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lampCable said:

Homework Statement


Given the IVP
<br /> \ddot{r}+\dot{r}+20r=0\\<br /> r(0) = 0.8\\<br /> \dot{r}(0) = 0<br />
for the length of an oscillating spring (damped), we find that the general solution is
<br /> r=e^{-0.5t}[0.8\cos(\sqrt{19.75}t)+\frac{0.4}{\sqrt{19.75}}\sin(\sqrt{19.75}t)]<br />
and I wish to find the curve bounding the upper part of the solution, i.e. the amplitude of the oscillations.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand that if
<br /> r=e^{-0.5t}0.8\cos(\sqrt{19.75}t)<br />
for example, then the amplitude would be obtained by removing the cosine factor, since e^{-0.5t}0.8 correspond to the amplitude and \cos(\sqrt{19.75}t) corresponds to how fast the spring is oscillating. But how does one do when there are two oscillating terms as above?
Use$$A\cos\theta + B\sin\theta = \sqrt{A^2+B^2}\left(\frac A {\sqrt{A^2+B^2}}\cos\theta + \frac B {\sqrt{A^2+B^2}}\sin\theta \right)$$ $$=\sqrt{A^2+B^2}\cos(\theta-\alpha)$$
 
  • Like
Likes lampCable
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top