Amusement Park Ride, Find Velocity at Point C

  • Thread starter Thread starter jlewallen18
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of a car on an amusement park ride at point C using conservation of energy principles. The car starts from rest at a height of 5.00 R and the radius of the loop is 16.0 m. The user correctly applies the energy conservation equation, simplifying the potential energy difference to find the speed at point C. A helpful tip is provided to simplify calculations by combining terms, which aids in arriving at the correct answer. The user successfully submits their answer, confirming their understanding of the process.
jlewallen18
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A car in an amusement park ride rolls without friction around the track shown in the figure (Figure 1) . It starts from rest at point A at a height h above the bottom of the loop. Treat the car as a particle.

If the car starts at height h= 5.00 R and the radius is R = 16.0m , compute the speed of the passengers when the car is at point C, which is at the end of a horizontal diameter.


Homework Equations



Conservation of Energy


The Attempt at a Solution



Using conservation of Energy

PE_i + KE_i = PE_f + KE_f

mgh = mgh + 1/2mv^2

mg(5R) = mg(R) + 1/2mv^2 (We are solving for V, so..)

mg(5R) - mg(R) = 1/2mv^2

(Cancel out mass)

g(5R) - g(R) = 1/2v^2

2(g(5R) - g(R)) = v^2

sqrt(2(g(5R) - g(R))) = V

(Plug in R)

sqrt(2(g(80) - g(5))) = V

If this is correct so far, is g just gravity or is it centripetal acceleration? I loose confidence at this step..Lead me in the right direction?

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    9.4 KB · Views: 835
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like you're doing alright.

Note that during your simplifications you could make mg(5R) - mg(R) into mg4R and save a lot of number pushing later on down the page.
 
gneill said:
Looks like you're doing alright.

Note that during your simplifications you could make mg(5R) - mg(R) into mg4R and save a lot of number pushing later on down the page.

Ok great, submitted my answer and it was right. Thanks for the tip for subtracting the R's. I didn't know if I was doing the right process. Thanks again
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top