An Electron and Neutron in a Finite Potential Well

Domnu
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Problem
Given that

\frac{2ma^2 |V|}{\hbar^2} = \left(\frac{7\pi}{4}\right)^2​

for an electron in a potential well of depth |V| and width 2a = 10^{-7} \text{cm}, if a 100\text{-keV} neutron is scattered by such a system, calculate the possible decrements in energy that the neutron may suffer.

Solution
We can easily calculate the depth of the potential from the given data... |V| = 4.60637 \text{eV}. Now, if we let \xi = ka while \nu = \kappa a, we know that

\xi^2 + \nu^2 = \left(\frac{7\pi}{4}\right)^2​

and solving this along with

\xi \tan \xi = \nu​

yields a pair of eigenenergies while solving it with

-\xi \cot \xi = \nu​

yields another pair of eigenenergies. We solve (using Mathematica, Maple, etc.) and find that the values of \nu can take on 5.3368, 4.8221, 3.8559, 2.0613, so that means that the eigenenergies take on the values (in milli-electron-volts) 2.36, 1.93, 1.23, 0.35 \text{meV}. This means that the neutron may suffer these decrements in energy. \blacksquare

Are my answers and arguments correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure. The mass of the neutron is obviously different from that of the electron, and what you've found is the different energies the electron could take on inside the well. I don't see how this would relate to energy decrements of a neutron scattered by the same system. Maybe someone else on here does?
 
Actually no, I think you're right.

Assuming the neutron is scattered elastically by the electron in the well, the neutron will lose energy equal to that of the electron. So, this is correct.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top