An electron in an oscillating magnetic field

Haorong Wu
Messages
417
Reaction score
90

Homework Statement


An electron is at rest in an oscillating magnetic field
$$ \mathbf B = B_0 cos\left( ωt \right) \hat k $$
where ##B_0## and ##ω## are constants.

What is the minimum field (##B_0##) required to force a complete flip in ##S_x##?

Homework Equations


$$H=- γ \mathbf B \cdot \mathbf S $$
$$ c^{(x)}_{-} = χ^{(x)†}_{-} χ$$

The Attempt at a Solution


I have solved that
$$ χ(t) = \begin{pmatrix} \frac 1 {\sqrt 2} exp \left( -i \frac {γ B_0} {2ω} sin ( ωt ) \right) \\ \frac 1 {\sqrt 2} exp \left( i \frac {γ B_0} {2ω} sin ( ωt ) \right) \end{pmatrix} $$
Also, the probability of getting ##- \frac \hbar 2## by measuring ##S_x## is
$$ P(- \frac \hbar 2 ) = {| c^{(x)}_{-} |}^2 = sin^2 ( \frac {γ B_0 sin(ωt)} {2ω}) $$

The statement of "to force a complete flip in ##S_x##" troubles me. Since English is not my first language, I failed to find out the meaning of the statement at google. From the solution, it seems that the probability ## P(- \frac \hbar 2 ) =1 ## relates to something that forces a complete flip.
So, what is a complete flip?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is definitely not clear, but I would consider a "complete flip" to mean going from spin-up to spin-down (or vice versa). In this case, it would be spin-up or down along the x axis.
 
DrClaude said:
This is definitely not clear, but I would consider a "complete flip" to mean going from spin-up to spin-down (or vice versa). In this case, it would be spin-up or down along the x axis.

But how does it relate to the probability ##P(- \frac \hbar 2)=1## ?

Thanks!
 
Haorong Wu said:
But how does it relate to the probability ##P(- \frac \hbar 2)=1## ?
Reading that as ##P(S_x = -\hbar/2)=1##, that corresponds to a spin-down state along x. So starting from spin-up, you have ##P(S_x = \hbar/2)=1##, and when ##P(S_x = -\hbar/2)=1## is attained, that means it is a "complete flip."
 
  • Like
Likes Haorong Wu
DrClaude said:
Reading that as ##P(S_x = -\hbar/2)=1##, that corresponds to a spin-down state along x. So starting from spin-up, you have ##P(S_x = \hbar/2)=1##, and when ##P(S_x = -\hbar/2)=1## is attained, that means it is a "complete flip."

Thank you very much! It makes sense to me now.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top