MHB An integral related to beta function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the integral identity involving the beta function and a specific integral form. Initially, the integral was incorrectly expressed, leading to confusion, but it was later corrected to show the relationship with the beta function and Euler's integral representation. The corrected form emphasizes the transformation of the integral into a more manageable expression, facilitating the proof. Additionally, the discussion includes a series expansion that relates to hypergeometric functions, illustrating the connection to the beta function. The conversation ultimately clarifies the integral's correct formulation and its implications in mathematical analysis.
alyafey22
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,556
Reaction score
2
Prove the following

$$\int^1_0 \frac{x^{r-1} (1-x)^{s-1}}{\left(ax+b(1-x)+c \right)^{r+s}}\, dx =\frac{\beta(r,s)}{ (a+c)^{r}(b+c)^{s}}$$
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let $I$ denote the integral. It is obvious to see that
$$I=(b+c)^{-r-s} B(r,s) {\;}_2F_1 \left(\begin{matrix}r+s,r \\ r+s\end{matrix};\frac{b-a}{b+c} \right)\tag{1} $$
where $_2F_1(a,b;c;z)$ denotes the Hypergeometric Function. Using equation (67) of this page, we get
$$\begin{align*}
I &=(b+c)^{-r-s} B(r,s) {\;}_2F_1 \left(\begin{matrix}1,r \\ 1\end{matrix};\frac{b-a}{b+c} \right)
\\
&=B(r,s) (b+c)^{-r-s} \left(1-\frac{b-a}{b+c}\right)^{-r} \\
&=\frac{B(r,s)}{(a+c)^r(b+c)^s} \tag{2}
\end{align*}$$
 
Last edited:
Shobhit said:
Let $I$ denote the integral. It is obvious to see that
$$I=(b+c)^{-r-s} B(r,s) {\;}_2F_1 \left(\begin{matrix}r+s,r \\ r+s\end{matrix};\frac{b-a}{b+c} \right)\tag{1} $$
where $_2F_1(a,b;c;z)$ denotes the Hypergeometric Function. Using equation (67) of this page, we get
$$\begin{align*}
I &=(b+c)^{-r-s} B(r,s) {\;}_2F_1 \left(\begin{matrix}1,r \\ 1\end{matrix};\frac{b-a}{b+c} \right)
\\
&=B(r,s) (b+c)^{-r-s} \left(1-\frac{b-a}{b+c}\right)^{-r} \\
&=\frac{B(r,s)}{(a+c)^r(b+c)^s} \tag{2}
\end{align*}$$
I've wanted to say this for a long time. Would you please explain the "obvious" to me?

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
I've wanted to say this for a long time. Would you please explain the "obvious" to me?

-Dan

The integral wasn't initially written correctly.

It should be

$$ \int_{0}^{1} \frac{x^{r-1} (1-x)^{s-1}}{ \Big( ax + b(1-x) + c \Big)^{s+r}} \ dx = \int_{0}^{1} x^{r-1} (1-x)^{s-1} \Big( b+c + (a-b)x \Big)^{-(r+s)} \ dx $$

$$ = (b+c)^{-(r+s)} \int_{0}^{1} x^{s-1} (1-x)^{r-1} \Big(1+ \frac{a-b}{b+c} x \Big)^{-(r+s)} \ dx $$

$$= (b+c)^{-(r+s)} \int_{0}^{1} x^{s-1} (1-x)^{r-1} \Big(1- \frac{b-a}{b+c} x \Big)^{-(r+s)} \ dx$$Then relate it to Euler's integral representation of $ {}_{2}F_{1}(a,b;c,z) $.

That is, relate it to $ \displaystyle {}_{2}F_{1}(a,b;c,z) = \frac{1}{B(b,c-b)} \int_{0}^{1} x^{b-1} (1-x)^{c-b-1} (1-tx)^{-a} \ dx$.
 
Last edited:
Random Variable said:
The integral wasn't initially written correctly.

It should be

$$ \int_{0}^{1} \frac{x^{r-1} (1-x)^{s-1}}{ \Big( ax + b(1-x) + c \Big)^{s+r}} \ dx = \int_{0}^{1} x^{r-1} (1-x)^{s-1} \Big( b+c + (a-b)x \Big)^{-(r+s)} \ dx $$

Sorry guys for the confusion (Headbang) . I corrected it.
 
And without referring to equation (67),

$$ \ {}_{1}F_{2} \Big(r+s,r;r+s;\frac{b-a}{b+c} \Big) = {}_{1}F_{0} \Big(r;-;\frac{b-a}{a+c} \Big) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{\Gamma(r+n)}{\Gamma(r)} \Big( \frac{b-a}{b+c} \Big)^{n} \frac{1}{n!}$$

$$ = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(r+n-1)(r+n-2) \cdots (r)}{n!} \Big(\frac{b-a}{b+c} \Big)^{n} $$

$$ = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (-1)^{n} (-1)^{n} \frac{r(r+1) \cdots (r+n-1)}{n!} \Big(\frac{b-a}{b+c} \Big)^{n}$$

$$ = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (-1)^{n} \frac{(-r)(-r-1) \cdots (-r-n+1)}{n!} \Big( \frac{b-a}{b+c} \Big)^{n} $$

$$ = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (-1)^{n} \binom{-r}{n} \Big( \frac{b-a}{b+c} \Big)^{n} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \binom{-r}{n}\Big( - \frac{b-a}{b+c} \Big)^{n} = \Big(1- \frac{b-a}{b+c} \Big)^{-r}$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top