Analyzing a Pulley System: Solving for Energy and Work

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around analyzing a pulley system to solve for energy and work, specifically focusing on the changes in kinetic and potential energy of two blocks involved in the system.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of energy conservation principles, questioning the calculations of potential and kinetic energy for the blocks. There are suggestions to simplify the problem by determining net forces and finding acceleration. Some participants raise concerns about potential typos in mass values and the inclusion of trigonometric functions in the potential energy calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants providing feedback on calculations and suggesting alternative approaches. There is recognition of potential errors in the original poster's work, particularly regarding mass values and the treatment of friction. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework guidelines, which may limit the depth of exploration into the problem. There are ongoing discussions about the assumptions made regarding forces and energy terms in the equations.

minimario
Messages
95
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


AjbiTtv.png


Homework Equations


## W_{nc} = \Delta KE + \Delta PE ##
## PE = mgh ##
## KE = \frac{1}{2} mv^2 ##

The Attempt at a Solution


For Block B, ## \Delta KE + \Delta PE = \frac{1}{2} 100 v^2 + (-20)(g)(100) ##

For Block A, ## \Delta KE + \Delta PE = \frac{1}{2} 50 v^2 + (20 \sin 37^{\circ})(g)(100) ##

Therefore, we have the total change in energy is ## 75 v^2 - 13702 ##. This is the total work done by nonconservative forces.

The only nonconservative force is friction on the A block. The normal force on the A block is ## 50g \cos 37^{\circ} ##, so the friction force is ## (0.25)(50g \cos 37^{\circ}) ## The work done by friction is then ## - 20 \cdot (0.25)(50g \cos 37^{\circ}) = 1956.66 ##, so ## 75v^2-13702 = 1956.66 \Rightarrow v^2 = 208.77 ##, so the Kinetic Energy change is ## \frac{1}{2} (50)(208.77) = 5219.25 ##

This is incorrect, can anyone find what's wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, for one thing, in the PE of A, the mass is 50 kg, not 100 kg. Is this a typo, or did you really use 100?

Chet
 
I suggest a simpler approach: determine the net force; from that and from the masses involved, find the acceleration, and you have solved a half of the problem...
 
Chestermiller said:
Well, for one thing, in the PE of A, the mass is 50 kg, not 100 kg. Is this a typo, or did you really use 100?

Chet
That was a typo.
 
There should be a sin 37 in the potential energy term of block B also.

Chet
 
Then the P.E.s of A and B cancel out?

That doesn't give the right ans either... (do you get v^2 = 52.1776)
 
minimario said:
Then the P.E.s of A and B cancel out?

That doesn't give the right ans either... (do you get v^2 = 52.1776)
No, they don't cancel out. Don't forget your typo on the masses.

Chet
 
So now v^2 = 104.73, is that right?
 
minimario said:
So now v^2 = 104.73, is that right?
Shouldn't the friction decrease the kinetic energy?

Chet
 
  • #10
Yes, but the 100 kg block provides the energy and accelerates it.
 
  • #11
minimario said:
Yes, but the 100 kg block provides the energy and accelerates it.
If there were no friction, the velocity of the blocks would be higher.

Chet
 
  • #12
What do you mean? The 100 kg provides a force to counteract the friction...
 
  • #13
minimario said:
What do you mean? The 100 kg provides a force to counteract the friction...
What I mean is that you have the wrong sign on the friction term.

One way to be sure is to solve the problem using force balances rather than the energy balance. At the very least, you should check to see that they both give the same answer.

Chet
 

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K