Analyzing Angular Motion in a Bicycle Wheel

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a rock in a bicycle wheel, focusing on its angular motion. The user is struggling with calculating the rock's angular velocity and acceleration after applying the brakes, noting that their initial calculations for angular velocity were incorrect. There is confusion regarding the problem's wording, which suggests that angular acceleration may change over time, but no information is provided to clarify this. The user is encouraged to consult their teacher for further clarification, as there appears to be a glitch in the assignment software affecting the entire class. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of interpreting physics problems and the importance of seeking help when needed.
SkyChurch
I'm stuck on this question: A rock stuck in the tread of a 59.0-{\rm cm}-diameter bicycle wheel has a tangential speed of 3.40 m/s. When the brakes are applied, the rock's tangential deceleration is 1.00 m/s^2.

a) What is the magnitudes of the rock's angular velocity at t = 1.70 s?
b) What is the magnitudes of the rock's angular acceleration at t = 1.70 s?
c) At what time is the magnitude of the rock's acceleration equal to g?

I've only really attempted part a so far and the equations I've used are: a(tangential)=r*a(angular) to find angular acc., v=r*w to find angular speed, and w final=w initial+a(angular)*t to find the angular speed at 1.7 s. I converted the radius, 29.5cm, to .295m and I'm getting 5.76 rad/s which is wrong. Where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wording of the problem, particularly parts b) and c), implies that the author thinks that the angular acceleration changes as time passes. In reality, this is almost certainly true, but there is nothing given in the problem statement, that I can see, to tell how this variation occurs.

I'd be interested in finding out what the intended solution for this problem is.
 
It's an even numbered problem in the book so I have no idea what the answer is. I see what you're saying though.
 
The answers in the back of the book have been known to be wrong, but in this case I think the author of the problem intended something that neither of us is seeing. The question is, are we not seeing it because we are overlooking it, or are we not seeing it because he failed to tell us? I still do not see it. I suggest you ask your teacher at the first opportunity, and please post what you learn.
 
this is an assignment on masteringphysics.com so that's how I know the answer's wrong. The website works in tandem with my physics book though, so if it was an odd numbered problem I'd at least be able to see what the answer is in the back of the book. The assignment's due at midnight tonight so if anyone else might have any idea please help.
 
There was a glitch in the software for that problem because the whole class emailed the teacher telling him. So I was right for part a and part b you would just find the angular acc from the tangential acc. Part c you would take the square root of (radial acc)^2 + (tang acc)^2 to get the total acceleration and then go about solving for the time.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top