Analyzing Inelastic Collision Data from a graph

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing a force versus displacement graph related to a head-on inelastic collision between two masses. Participants express confusion over how to interpret the graph and apply relevant physics equations, particularly regarding impulse, momentum, and energy. There is uncertainty about the values derived from the graph, such as the velocities and forces acting on each mass. Clarification is sought on distinguishing between the forces on the two objects and understanding the implications of the graph for the collision dynamics. The conversation emphasizes the need for a clear understanding of the relationships between force, displacement, and time in the context of the problem.
elements
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A head on collision between mass and mass B occurs as described in the F vs s graph below.

Complete the table in the data section

Find \vec{x}A
Find \vec{x}B

see attached page for clarification

Homework Equations


P=m*v
\DeltaP=F*t
Ek=\stackrel{1}{2}mv2
\vec{d} = \vec{v}t
W=F*\vec{d}

The Attempt at a Solution



I've attempted to use the impulse and the momentum formula to apply to the graph but the numbers just isn't matching up I am unsure of how the 0 and 75 was arrived at just by observing the graph nor can I figure out how velocity 1 was 24 vs v2 at 0.

This is algebraic physics not calculus.
 

Attachments

  • 20140413_212857.jpg
    20140413_212857.jpg
    22.2 KB · Views: 508
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
elements said:

Homework Statement



A head on collision between mass and mass B occurs as described in the F vs s graph below.

Complete the table in the data section

Find \vec{x}A
Find \vec{x}B

see attached page for clarification

Homework Equations


P=mv
\DeltaP=Ft



The Attempt at a Solution



I've attempted to use the impulse and the momentum formula to apply to the graph but the numbers just isn't matching up I am unsure of how the 0 and 75 was arrived at just by observing the graph nor can I figure out how velocity 1 was 24 vs v2 at 0.

This is algebraic physics not calculus.
I don't quite understand your graph. There are two forces: the force on A and the force on B. There is one line joining several data points (F, s). Which parts of the graph relate to the force on A and which relate to the force on B?

AM
 
The impulse is the area under the F vs t graph.
You graph is F vs s (is s displacement?) ... what equations have force and displacement together?

Physics without calculus??!
Oh and I see the "lab" did not involve any actual practical work.

It looks a bit like sudoku: you can't just fill it in left to right. The force-displacement graph can be used to tell you the work, and so the change in energy. You need the relations between work, energy, and force, and displacement to understand it.

The graph looks like the force-displacement for one object from the point of contact.
It approaches the target under acceleration of 8N force pointing the other way, comes to rest, then bounces off.
The force during the recoil is less than during the approach.
Is this correct?

These look to be pretty big objects though.
 
Last edited:
Simon Bridge said:
The impulse is the area under the F vs t graph.
You graph is F vs s (is s displacement?) ... what equations have force and displacement together?

Physics without calculus??!
Oh and I see the "lab" did not involve any actual practical work.

It looks a bit like sudoku: you can't just fill it in left to right. The force-displacement graph can be used to tell you the work, and so the change in energy. You need the relations between work, energy, and force, and displacement to understand it.

The graph looks like the force-displacement for one object from the point of contact.
It approaches the target under acceleration of 8N force pointing the other way, comes to rest, then bounces off.
The force during the recoil is less than during the approach.
Is this correct?

These look to be pretty big objects though.

Well this is a collision type problem, which means conservation of momentum occurs, so I'd assume you are correct but I'm not so sure, myself. I mean I have the impulse and Kinetic energy recorded per area of contact with the force turning points. But I am not sure how to factor in the time thing or what xa means, I'm assuming it's displacement of object A and object B but I have no clue how to find that out from the graph or the data given. especially with time involved, I don't know where 1s is or where 0s was.

Andrew Mason said:
I don't quite understand your graph. There are two forces: the force on A and the force on B. There is one line joining several data points (F, s). Which parts of the graph relate to the force on A and which relate to the force on B?

AM

I do not know which relates to which, what I do know is that this is a inelastic collision so I am assuming that that is the total force/displacement of the two objects together.
 
Last edited:
elements said:
I do not know which relates to which, what I do know is that this is a inelastic collision so I am assuming that that is the total force/displacement of the two objects together.
? The motion of the centre of mass of the two objects cannot change if the only forces are due to the collision. So if the graph is supposed to represent the force on the two bodies stuck together after the collision, the force should be 0.

Can you give us the whole problem as it was presented to you, before you wrote anything on the graph? Can you then give us all the data that you have and tell us where it comes from?

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top