Analyzing Net Forces and Equations in a Driven Mass on a Circular Path System

  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Mass
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the equations governing a driven mass on a circular path system, specifically addressing the forces acting on two masses connected by springs. Participants highlight the need for clarity in the equations, suggesting the inclusion of angular variables θ1 and θ2 to denote the positions of the masses. There are mentions of potential sign errors and the importance of consistent directionality for the variables x1 and x2, which can represent angles or arc lengths. The implications of different configurations, such as both masses moving in the same direction, are also considered in relation to the net forces exerted by the springs. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for precise formulation and understanding of the system's dynamics.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
All below
Relevant Equations
All below
1594764359971.png

1594764406949.png

What you think about this system:?

F*cosw - k(x1+x2) - k(x1-x2) = mx1''
-k(x1+x2) - k(x1-x2) = mx2''
 

Attachments

  • 1594764376191.png
    1594764376191.png
    5.2 KB · Views: 183
Physics news on Phys.org
LCSphysicist said:
What you think about this system:?

F*cosw - k(x1+x2) - k(x1-x2) = mx1''
-k(x1+x2) - k(x1-x2) = mx2''
It would help if you could post this using LaTeX (see the LaTeX Guide link at the lower left of the Edit window. Thanks.

Also, could you please explain the equations you are trying to write? It looks like you are trying to write F=ma type equations, but your terms are not clear to me (especially since some parts seem to be missing). Also, at some point fairly soon you will need to include the variables ##\theta_1## and ##\theta_2## to denote the positions of the two masses as functions of time...
 
LCSphysicist said:
What you think about this system:?

F*cosw - k(x1+x2) - k(x1-x2) = mx1''
-k(x1+x2) - k(x1-x2) = mx2''
Some sign errors.
berkeman said:
you will need to include the variables θ1 and θ2
The x1 and x2 can be taken as angles, or arc lengths, whatever.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Maybe the problem is adopt one clockwise and another counterclockwise?
This came to my mind when i attack the problem, but i went on just to see if i could try by this another way as well as adopt just clockwise [or counterclokwise]. But what i can't refut is why would it be wrong, that is:

## F*cos(wt) - [k(x1+x2)] - k(x1-x2) = m \frac{d^2 x1}{dt^2} ##
## [-k(x1+x2)] - k(x1-x2) = m \frac{d^2 x2}{dt^2} ##

the bracket being to the left spring:
If x2 = 0 and x1 > 0, will be a force on m1 in its negative direction, as to x2. Works as well to x1<0

Without bracket to the right spring:

If x2 = 0 and x1 > 0, will be a force on m1 in its negative direction, as to x2. Also works to x1<0

About the Latex, i will try ;)
 
LCSphysicist said:
Maybe the problem is adopt one clockwise and another counterclockwise?
This came to my mind when i attack the problem, but i went on just to see if i could try by this another way as well as adopt just clockwise [or counterclokwise]. But what i can't refut is why would it be wrong, that is:

## F*cos(wt) - [k(x1+x2)] - k(x1-x2) = m \frac{d^2 x1}{dt^2} ##
## [-k(x1+x2)] - k(x1-x2) = m \frac{d^2 x2}{dt^2} ##

the bracket being to the left spring:
If x2 = 0 and x1 > 0, will be a force on m1 in its negative direction, as to x2. Works as well to x1<0

Without bracket to the right spring:

If x2 = 0 and x1 > 0, will be a force on m1 in its negative direction, as to x2. Also works to x1<0

About the Latex, i will try ;)
Consider the case x1=-x2, so both move the same direction around the hoop. What net forces will spring exert on them? What do your equations give?
 
  • Like
Likes LCSphysicist
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top