Angle Between Hour & Second Hand:130.25° or 133°?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ador250
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clock
AI Thread Summary
The correct angle between the hour and second hand of a clock set to 10:20:30 is 130.25°. The hour hand moves 0.5° per minute, so after 20.5 minutes, it has traversed an additional 10.25°, totaling 310.25° from the 10 o'clock position. The second hand, after 30 seconds, is at the 6 o'clock position, which is 180°. The confusion arose from an incorrect calculation that mistakenly included an extra angular distance from the minute hand, leading to the incorrect answer of 133°. The accurate calculation clarifies the angle between the two hands.
ador250
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
a clock was set 10 am 20 minutes 30 second ? what will be the angle between hour & second hand ??

ans : 130.25° or 133° which one is correct? I'm confused
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The line of reasoning should be as follows:-

It takes 12 hours for the hour hand to make a complete 360° rotation, i.e.

12 hours-------> 360°
==> 1 hour -------> 30°
==> 60 min -------> 30°
==> 1 min -------> 0.5°
==> 20.5 min -------> 10.25°

So, in a time period of 20.5 minutes, the hour hand would have traversed 10.25°.

Now, when the clock shows 10 A.M exactly, the hour hand has traversed 300° (since for each hour, the hour hand traverses 30°. So, after 10 hours exactly, it has traversed 300°). And in a further 20 minutes and 30 seconds, i.e. 20.5 minutes, it would have traversed 10.25° further, as we have just calculated above. So, the total angular distance traversed by the hour hand is (300+10.25)° = 310.25°.

Now, the second hand is at the exact position '6' in the clock (since it travels for a period of 30 seconds), and hence has traversed exactly half of the clock, thus traveling an angular distance of 180°.

Therefore, the angle between the hour hand and the second hand would be (310.25 - 180)° = 130.25°.

Hope that makes it clear! :smile:
 
The more interesting question is how the other answer was obtained.

Offhand, it looks like a factor of 12 got erroneously applied to the seconds correction.
 
jbriggs444 said:
The more interesting question is how the other answer was obtained.

Offhand, it looks like a factor of 12 got erroneously applied to the seconds correction.

The best explanation I could come up with is, that the OP first figured that at exactly 10:20 A.M, the hour hand would have traversed 310°. Then, for the remaining 30 seconds, he mistakenly calculated the angular distance traversed by the minute hand, which turns out to be 3°, and then added it to the angular distance traversed by the hour hand, giving him the final value of the latter as 313°. And since the second hand has traversed 180°, he obtains (313 - 180)° = 133°, which is false.
 
Ryuzaki said:
... Then, for the remaining 30 seconds, he mistakenly calculated the angular distance traversed by the minute hand, which turns out to be 3°...

Nice. That fits.
 
got it man...thanks :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top