Angle from force applied / Momentum question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the impulse delivered to a hockey puck after being hit by a stick, with the initial and final velocities provided. The impulse magnitude was calculated as 11.18 kg m/s using the difference in velocities. For determining the angle of the force applied, participants suggest using vector components and consider the final velocity's quadrant. Additionally, there is a query about whether the total momentum of three particles can be zero while their individual momenta are not, with a consensus that this is possible if the particles are in the same plane. The conversation emphasizes the importance of vector diagrams for visualizing angles and momentum.
Kaln0s
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Okay the first question is:

1. A hockey puck with mass 0.250 kg has initial velocity 3.00 i + 5.00 j m/s just before being hit by a hockey stick. The final velocity after the hit is -37.0 i + 25.0 j m/s. What was the magnitude of the impulse delivered by the stick to the puck, in kg m/s?

For this I just took the final velocity - initial and took the magnitude to get .250 sqrt[-40^2 + 20^2] = 11.18

Part two though I have no idea how to do.

2. What is the angle of the force applied to the hockey puck in the previous problem? The angle should be measured with respect to the positive x-axis in degrees.

below.

3. Is it possible for the total momentum of three particles to be zero, even though the momentum of the individual particles is not?

below.

Homework Equations



p= mv
Velocityf - Velocityi

The Attempt at a Solution



2. I'm not sure how to do this... I thought of just doing the y over x component 400/1600 = 1/4 = 45 degrees. I don't think that's right though because looking at the final velocity it looks like it will be in quadrant 2 maybe?

3. I said yes as long as they were in the same plane because they wouldn't be able to be expressed in terms of each other. (mostly need confirmation on this yes / no)

Thanks for your help!

:biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
2. you have the direction of the initial, final velocity, and you have also calulated the direction of the impulse. Draw a vector diagram and find any angle that is necessary.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top