Angle of principal stress vs maximum shear stress

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the angles of principal stress and maximum shear stress in a given state of stress. Participants are examining the discrepancies between their calculated angles and those provided in the problem statement, as well as the implications of these angles on the corresponding shear stress values. The scope includes theoretical and mathematical reasoning related to stress analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant claims their calculated angle for principal stress, $$\theta_s1$$, is +35 degrees, while the provided answer is -55 degrees.
  • Another participant updates their calculations, showing that using -55 degrees yields a maximum shear stress of 90 MPa, while +35 degrees results in -90 MPa, raising questions about the validity of these results.
  • Several participants present equations for normal and shear stress, indicating that principal stresses occur where shear stress is zero, leading to various calculated angles for principal and shear stresses.
  • One participant suggests that the maximum shear stress occurs at two angles: +35.3 degrees and -54.7 degrees, both yielding a maximum shear stress of +90.13 MPa.
  • Another participant provides a sketch illustrating the variation of shear stress vectors on a cylinder, indicating that maximum shear stress vectors correspond to both -55 degrees and +35 degrees, suggesting a complex distribution of shear stress.
  • There is a request for clarification on the discrepancies observed when comparing results from calculations with those derived from Mohr's circle, indicating potential confusion or misunderstanding regarding the graphical representation of stress states.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct angles for principal and maximum shear stresses, with no consensus reached on which angle is definitively correct. Multiple competing views remain regarding the interpretation of the results and the application of Mohr's circle.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the calculations depend on the definitions and assumptions made regarding the stress state, and there are unresolved questions about the accuracy of the angles derived from Mohr's circle compared to direct calculations.

  • #31
fonseh said:
it's ok if you don't want to deal with the rotation business ,
can you explain why at ##\theta = 90## degrees, ##\vec{i}_\theta=-\vec{i}## ??
Are you familiar with cylindrical polar coordinates? If so, are you familiar with the unit vectors in the radial and circumferential directions? Our focus is on the unit vector in the circumferential direction. Please describe how this circumferential unit vector varies (i.e., the direction in which it points) as a function of the circumferential coordinate, which is measured counterclockwise relative to the positive x axis. What direction does the unit vector in the circumferential direction point when the circumferential coordinate is 90 degrees?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
fonseh said:
So , according to you , in the mohr's circle , you defined counterclockwise as positive , and the sign convention of the shear stress / force follow this also ?
So , for the point where the 100MPa tensile normal stress act , the shear stress will turn the element clockwise , so the shear stress has negative value ?
I told you I am no longer going to discuss the rotation business. You are using the word "turn" in place of the word "rotate." It's just, as the american idiom describes, a "wolf in sheep's clothing."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
  • #33
Chestermiller said:
Are you familiar with cylindrical polar coordinates? If so, are you familiar with the unit vectors in the radial and circumferential directions? Our focus is on the unit vector in the circumferential direction. Please describe how this circumferential unit vector varies (i.e., the direction in which it points) as a function of the circumferential coordinate, which is measured counterclockwise relative to the positive x axis. What direction does the unit vector in the circumferential direction point when the circumferential coordinate is 90 degrees?
Ok , i understand the cylindrical polar coordinate . But i still don't understand why you said at ##\theta = 90## degrees, ##\vec{i}_\theta=-\vec{i}## ?
In polar coordinate , the angle 0 start from positive x( horizontal axis) and rotate couterclockwise , right ?
 
  • #34
fonseh said:
Ok , i understand the cylindrical polar coordinate . But i still don't understand why you said at ##\theta = 90## degrees, ##\vec{i}_\theta=-\vec{i}## ?
In polar coordinate , the angle 0 start from positive x( horizontal axis) and rotate couterclockwise , right ?
What direction does ##\vec{i}_\theta## point at ##\theta=90## degrees?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
  • #35
Chestermiller said:
What direction does ##\vec{i}_\theta## point at ##\theta=90## degrees?
positive y-axis (upwards) am I right?
 
  • #36
fonseh said:
positive y-axis (upwards) am I right?
No. ##i_{\theta}## is tangent to the circumference. So, again, what direction is it pointing?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
  • #37
Chestermiller said:
No. ##i_{\theta}## is tangent to the circumference. So, again, what direction is it pointing?
As the angle is rotated anticlockwise , so the tangent at here pointing to the left ? Pls refer to the photo below ?
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0043.JPG
    DSC_0043.JPG
    21.5 KB · Views: 429
  • #38
fonseh said:
As the angle is rotated anticlockwise , so the tangent at here pointing to the left ? Pls refer to the photo below ?
Yes. It is pointing in the negative x direction. It is thus equal to ##-\vec{i}##, where ##\vec{i}## is the cartesian unit vector in the (positive) x direction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
  • #39
Chestermiller said:
Yes. It is pointing in the negative x direction. It is thus equal to ##-\vec{i}##, where ##\vec{i}## is the cartesian unit vector in the (positive) x direction.
ok , i don't understand why you are considering the vector of the tangent of the line ?
 
  • #40
fonseh said:
ok , i don't understand why you are considering the vector of the tangent of the line ?
Because that is the direction of the shear stress on a plane tangent to the cylinder.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
  • #41
Chestermiller said:
Because that is the direction of the shear stress on a plane tangent to the cylinder.
Can you explain further ? I still didnt get that
 
Last edited:
  • #42
fonseh said:
Can you explain further ?
We are trying to determine the normal stress and shear stress on planes of various orientations within the material. The tangent planes to a cylinder whose axis is pointing in the z direction include all possible orientations of such planes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
  • #43
Chestermiller said:
We are trying to determine the normal stress and shear stress on planes of various orientations within the material. The tangent planes to a cylinder whose axis is pointing in the z direction include all possible orientations of such planes.
We are dealing with stress in 2 dimension only , right ? which are y and x axes , right ?
 
  • #44
fonseh said:
We are dealing with stress in 2 dimension only , right ? which are y and x axes , right ?
Right. The planes tangent to the cylinder I indicated include all the planes of interest in our x-y framework. The unit vectors normal and tangent to the planes I indicated all lie within the x-y plane (a plane of constant z). Not only do these tangent planes to the cylinder include all possible orientations, but they are automatically ordered in sequence.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
  • #45
Chestermiller said:
We are trying to determine the normal stress and shear stress on planes of various orientations within the material. The tangent planes to a cylinder whose axis is pointing in the z direction include all possible orientations of such planes.
why are they many orientations ? there are only positive / negative x and y axes , right ?
 
  • #46
Chestermiller said:
Right. The planes tangent to the cylinder I indicated include all the planes of interest in our x-y framework. The unit vectors normal and tangent to the planes I indicated all lie within the x-y plane (a plane of constant z). Not only do these tangent planes to the cylinder include all possible orientations, but they are automatically ordered in sequence.
why there is cylinder ? in the original question in post # 1, it's a cube , right ? or something which has square / rectangular base
 
  • #47
fonseh said:
why there is cylinder ? in the original question in post # 1, it's a cube , right ? or something which has square / rectangular base
I doesn't have to be square or rectangular. You do realize that what we are trying to do here is determine the normal stress and the shear stress on a plane of arbitrarily specified spatial orientation, given the normal stress and shear stresses on two specific planes, one oriented perpendicular to the x-axis (normal- and shear stresses ##\sigma_x## and ##\tau_{xy}##) and the other perpendicular to the y-axis (normal- and shear stresses ##\sigma_y## and ##\tau_{xy}##), correct? In the problem statement, part iii, they specify a particular plane and then ask you to determine the normal- and shear stresses on this plane. That is the whole objective of what we are trying to do here. So, don't get hung up on cubes and rectangles.

The reason we are working with a cylinder is that the infinite set of planes tangent to the cylinder include all possible orientations of such planes, ordered in sequence as a function of ##\theta##. The Mohr's circle presents the combination of normal stress and shear stress for the entire set of possible planes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
  • #48
Chestermiller said:
I doesn't have to be square or rectangular. You do realize that what we are trying to do here is determine the normal stress and the shear stress on a plane of arbitrarily specified spatial orientation, given the normal stress and shear stresses on two specific planes, one oriented perpendicular to the x-axis (normal- and shear stresses ##\sigma_x## and ##\tau_{xy}##) and the other perpendicular to the y-axis (normal- and shear stresses ##\sigma_y## and ##\tau_{xy}##), correct? In the problem statement, part iii, they specify a particular plane and then ask you to determine the normal- and shear stresses on this plane. That is the whole objective of what we are trying to do here. So, don't get hung up on cubes and rectangles.

The reason we are working with a cylinder is that the infinite set of planes tangent to the cylinder include all possible orientations of such planes, ordered in sequence as a function of ##\theta##. The Mohr's circle presents the combination of normal stress and shear stress for the entire set of possible planes.
ok , i understand it . Although it's not quite related to mechanics of materials . I was hoping to verify the sign convention of the stresses in mohr's circle .Although now i am still not sure why some books plot the positive shear stress axis downwards / upwards , and the shear stress that turn the element clockwise / anticlockwise is positive
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K