Calculating Angular Magnification of a Lens Without Knowing Object Height

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the image position and angular magnification of a lens with a small insect placed 6.55 cm from a 7.00 cm focal-length lens. The image distance is determined to be approximately -101.9 cm, indicating a virtual image. Participants express uncertainty about calculating angular magnification without knowing the object's height, as they believe the near point may not apply in this case. Linear magnification was attempted but deemed incorrect, leading to confusion about the question's requirements. The proximity of the object to the focal point is noted, suggesting that if it were exactly at the focal point, the image would be at infinity, yielding a specific angular magnification value.
grouper
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A small insect is placed 6.55 cm from a 7.00 cm-focal-length lens. Calculate the position of the image. Calculate the angular magnification.

Homework Equations



1/f=1/do+1/di

M=angular magnification=θ'/θ=angle of image/angle of object=N/f where N=near point

The Attempt at a Solution



Finding the image distance is easy using the lens equation and is -101.9 cm. I don't think this problem deals with the near point (although I may be wrong), so the angles need to be known for both the object and image, but I don't know how to do this if the height of the object is unknown. Perhaps I am missing the significance of something (probably something to do with the near point). Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I calculated the image distance and got the same as you, 102cm (I have rounded off!)
If this image is being viewed through the lens then it is not at the near point ( I take the near point to be 25cm) so, like you, I am not certain what the question wants.
The next obvious thing I did was calculate the linear magnification 102/6.55 = 15.6.
Don't know if this is any help to you.
 
Yes, the image distance is ≈-100 cm, I got that part of the question correct. I already tried the linear magnification of 15.6, but that was incorrect. Hopefully someone can help me out before Sunday when it's due. Thanks for trying though. I've got another one nobody has responded to if you'd like to take a look: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=549189
 
One other thing strikes me about this question: the object (small insect) is practically at the focal point of the lens (6.55 cm, 7cm). If it was at the focal point the image would be at infinity and the angular magnification would be 25/7 (D/f) = 3.6.
I know this is not what is being asked but I like to get what I can from the question.
It would be interesting to have a chat with the person who made up the question !
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
I was thinking using 2 purple mattress samples, and taping them together, I do want other ideas though, the main guidelines are; Must have a volume LESS than 1600 cubic centimeters, and CAN'T exceed 25 cm in ANY direction. Must be LESS than 1 kg. NO parachutes. NO glue or Tape can touch the egg. MUST be able to take egg out in less than 1 minute. Grade A large eggs will be used.
Back
Top