Angular momentum of Moebius strip?

AI Thread Summary
A Moebius strip with mass and radius can exhibit angular momentum if the twist rotates while the mass remains stationary. However, under symmetric conditions, the total angular momentum would be zero due to the pairing of elements with equal and opposite angular momenta. The discussion also raises the intriguing question of how a Moebius strip would behave in a magnetic field, particularly regarding induced currents. While local eddy currents may form in the twist, a global current is unlikely. The conversation highlights the complexities of angular momentum and electromagnetic induction in unique geometries.
Nemus
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Here is something that keeps me up at night...Assume a Moebius strip with mass m and radius r. Let the twist rotate but not the mass of the strip in general. Would it have an angular momentum? If yes, what would it be?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would it have an angular momentum?
Yes.
If yes, what would it be?
Zero.
 
and the argument goes as follows...
 
The total angular momentum would be r*dp integrated over the strip.If the twist is symmetric & is turned evenly, we can pair up elements with equal & opposite angular momenta by symmetry. So, the answer would be zero if we have sufficient symmetric conditions.
 
Although it should be posted as a different question, I couldn't help but wonder what would happen if we turn a Moebius strip in a magnetic field.What would be the current induced in the strip?
 
Good argument. Symmetry is sufficent. Thanks.
Cool idea with the induction. I am tempted to bring out my hammer...
There would be a local eddy current in the twist for sure but I don't think there would be a global current. A gigant Moebius strip in sitting above the equator of Earth for example.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top