Angular Momentum of Two Particle System

Kites
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a particle of mass m and a particle of mass 2m. They are connected by a horizontal, massless, rigid rod of length 2a. The rod is fixed to a vertical stick that connects to the rod's midpoint. The stick is spinning with constant angular speed.

Consider a point P, located on the stick a distance d below the rod. Show that angular momentum of the two particle system, when taken about point P, is not conserved.

Homework Equations



L = r X p

theta = 90 degrees

The Attempt at a Solution



So what I've done is find angular momentum for either mass, separately.
Doing the following:

L_1 = R x P
= |r||p| sin(theta)
= (a^2+d^2)^(1/2)* ma(omega)

L_2 = R x P
= |r||p| sin(theta)
= (a^2+d^2)^(1/2)*2ma(omega)

What I want to do... by intuition... is just add these two together. but they're magnitudes not vectors... so i am a bit confused if I can.

If not, what the heck do I do?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
angular momentum is a vector

Kites said:
L_1 = R x P
= |r||p| sin(theta)
= (a^2+d^2)^(1/2)* ma(omega)

L_2 = R x P
= |r||p| sin(theta)
= (a^2+d^2)^(1/2)*2ma(omega)

What I want to do... by intuition... is just add these two together. but they're magnitudes not vectors... so i am a bit confused if I can.

If not, what the heck do I do?

Hi Kites! :smile:

Angular momentum is a vector (strictly, a pseudovector), not a scalar …

it's the cross-product of two vectors! :smile:

The moment form of good ol' Newton's second law is Net Torque = rate of change of angular momentum … and both sides of the equation are (pseudo-)vectors. :biggrin:

Most exam questions on angular momentum are two-dimensional, so the angular momentums are all perpendicular to the plane of the exam paper, and you can just add them!

But this question is three-dimensional … so you must treat them like the vectors they really are. :smile:

(btw, applying Newton's second law, can you see why it's not conserved? :wink:)
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top