Angular momentum problem - what am I doing wrong?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a problem related to Hohmann transfer orbits and the application of conservation laws. The user attempts to derive the velocity boost needed for a spacecraft to transition between two circular orbits using conservation of energy and angular momentum principles. They correctly set up the equations but encounter issues leading to negative square roots when substituting values. The user seeks clarification on the steps to resolve these mathematical inconsistencies and achieve the expected result. Understanding the correct application of the conservation laws is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
henryc09
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A hohmann transfer orbit is a way of transferring a spacecraft between two planetary orbits (which we shall assume to be circular) by using one half of an elliptical orbit about the sun.

Suppose the spacecraft is initially moving around the sun with orbital speed v1 of the first planet, at radius R1, and we wish to move it to a larger orbital radius R2. Let their orbital speeds of the spacecraft at perihelion (point A)(sorry I can't show you the diagram) and aphelion (point B) in the elliptical orbit be vA and vB respectively. Write down the conditions on vA and vB assuming the planets have a negligible gravitational effect compared to the sun based on: (i) the conservation of energy (ii) the conservation of angular momentum.

Hence show that that the velocity boost required to accelerate the spacecraft into the transfer orbit is
change in v = vA-v1 = sqrt(GM/R1) [sqrt(2R2/(R1+R2)) - 1]

where M is mass of sun


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


well I think that conservation of energy would be:

0.5mvA^2 - GmM/R1 = 0.5mvB^2 - GmM/R2

divide through by m

conservation of angular momentum would be:

-mR1vA = -mR2vB

R1vA=R2vB

Then you have that the centripetal force acting on the spacecraft when it's moving in a circular orbit is mv1^2/R1 = GmM/R1^2

giving v1 as sqrt(GM/R1)

but then when I say that Vb = VaR1/R2 and substitute this into the conservation of energy equation I end up with negative square roots and can't get to the result it gives. I'm probably being really stupid but could someone talk me through the steps or point out what I'm doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
r u frm UCL??
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top