Angular mometum and the commutator?

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


show that
<br /> [L_z,L_x]=i(\hbar)L_y<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



[A,B]=AB-BA
<br /> L_z=xP_y-yP_x<br />
<br /> L_x=yP_z-ZP_x<br />
So do i just use the fact that [A,B]= AB-BA
and then use the momentum operators and substitute everything in an churn out the algebra to reduce it down.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You already know what the operators L_x,\ L_z are defined as in terms of differentials.

For example, L_x = -i\hbar\left(y\frac{\partial}{\partial x} - z\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\right)

Just make use of the following operator identities:

[A,B+C] = [A,B]+[A,C]
[A,BC] = [A,B]C+B[A,C]

and you should be able to manipulate them into what you want. I'm not sure [A,B] = AB - BA would have been sufficient in and of itself.
 
thanks for your response
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top