Angular motion with constant acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on two particles, A and B, both undergoing constant angular acceleration. Particle A's angular position is defined by the equation theta(t) = theta_0 + omega_0t + 0.5alpha t^2, while particle B has twice the angular acceleration and half the angular velocity at time t=t_1, yet starts at the same position as A. To find when the angular velocity of B equals that of A, participants derive expressions for angular velocities and equate them, leading to a need for careful algebraic manipulation. The final goal is to express the time difference t - t_1 in terms of known variables, ultimately aiming for a solution that aligns with the expected answer. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly setting up the equations and addressing time dependencies in the calculations.
jaded18
Messages
149
Reaction score
0
Consider two particles A and B. The angular position of particle A, with constant angular acceleration, depends on time according to theta(t)=theta_0+omega_0t+alpha t^2. At time t=t_1, particle B, which also undergoes constant angular accelaration, has twice the angular acceleration, half the angular velocity, and the same angular position that particle A had at time t=0.
How long after the time t_1 does the angular velocity of B have to be to equal A's?
___
ok, here we go:
i know that i have to write expressions for the angular velocity of A and B as functions of time, and solve for t-t1?
For A, omega(t) = omega_0 + alpha(t) and
for B, omega(t) = 0.5 omega_0 + 2alpha(t-t_1)
so when i equate them and solve for t-t_1, i get something that is not the right answer!

please help :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One wants expressions for \theta_A(t) and \theta_B(t), which are set equal at time t, so one can solve for time t, then find t - t1.

at t = 0, \theta_A(0) = \theta_0, and at t=t1, \theta_B(t_1) = \theta_0, which is the starting position of A at t=0.

In the expression for B, one has to address the time lag t1.
 
can anyone please just lay it out for me .. because i can't see it
 
Last edited:
One has for A, \theta(t) = \theta_0\,+\,\omega_0t+\alpha t^2/2,

and for B, one must use t-t1 since it starts at t1, with

angular acceleration 2\alpha and angular velocity 0.5\omega.

At the same position \theta_A(t)=\theta_B(t)
 
Last edited:
how do i get to the answer. i know that the answer is (omega_0 + 2alpha(t_1)) / (2alpha) but i want to know how they got that. and i need to know what i did wrong in #1 box because it looks okay to me
 
i KNOW theta A equation and theta B equation.
 
Oops, sorry, I was solving for the same position.

If theta(t)=theta_0+omega_0t+ 0.5alpha t^2 for A, then

omega_A(t) = omega_0 + alpha *t

for B

omega_B(t) = 0.5*omega_0 + 2 alpha *(t-t1)

when one differentiates t2, the derivative is 2t.
 
Last edited:
you are wrong. i am sorry. i will change what i said in #1

Consider two particles A and B. The angular position of particle A, with constant angular acceleration, depends on time according to theta(t)=theta_0+omega_0t+0.5alpha t^2. At time t=t_1, particle B, which also undergoes constant angular accelaration, has twice the angular acceleration, half the angular velocity, and the same angular position that particle A had at time t=0.
How long after the time t_1 does the angular velocity of B have to be to equal A's?
___
ok, here we go:
i know that i have to write expressions for the angular velocity of A and B as functions of time, and solve for t-t1?
For A, omega(t) = omega_0 + alpha(t) and
for B, omega(t) = 0.5 omega_0 + 2alpha(t-t_1)
so when i equate them and solve for t-t_1, i get something that is not the right answer!

please help :(

IT IS 0.5 ALPHA T^2
 
THEREFORE For A, omega(t) = omega_0 + alpha(t) and
for B, omega(t) = 0.5 omega_0 + 2alpha(t-t_1)

now what do i do with these equations?
 
  • #10
I suspect the problem is simply algebraic.

Equate the two expressions for angular velocity.

\omega_A(t) = \omega_B(t)

\omega_0\,+\,\alpha{t}\,=\,\omega_0/2\,+\,2\alpha{(t-t_1)}

which leads to

\omega_0/2 \,=\, 2\alpha{(t-t_1)}\,-\,\alpha{t}

or


\omega_0/2 \,= \,\alpha{t} - 2 \alpha{t_1}

take an alpha t_1 to the other side

\omega_0/2 + \alpha{t_1} \,= \,\alpha{t} - \alpha{t_1}

and see where that leads one
 
Last edited:
Back
Top