Angular size in degrees problem,

  • Thread starter Thread starter astru025
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angular Degrees
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular size of car headlights 13 km away, which are 1.5 m apart. The formula provided, 57°(w/d), is used to convert the width and distance into degrees. Initial calculations led to confusion as the result was in radians instead of degrees. The correct approach involves multiplying the ratio of width to distance by 57 to obtain the angular size in degrees. The final correct answer for the angular size is approximately 0.0066 degrees.
astru025
Messages
163
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For distant objects, the angular size in degrees can be approximated as 57° (w/d), where w is the width of the object and d is its distance. What is the angular size of the headlights on a car 13 km away if the headlights are 1.5 m apart?

Homework Equations



D/w

The Attempt at a Solution


13 km to m = 13000 m. 1.5 m / 13000 m = 1.15E-4. This answer was incorrect and I'm trying to figure out what I'm doing wrong. Any help would be really nice, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does "57° (w/d)" mean?

Are you sure it doesn't say "0.57(w/d)" ?

I ask because the correct angle would be about Cos-1(w/d) which is 0.66 E-4 and..

0.66/1.15 = 0.57
 
astru025 said:

The Attempt at a Solution


13 km to m = 13000 m. 1.5 m / 13000 m = 1.15E-4. This answer was incorrect and I'm trying to figure out what I'm doing wrong. Any help would be really nice, thanks!

The answer is not incorrect but it is in radians.
Your problem "expects" you to calculate in degrees. Why don't you just apply the full formula given in the text? Multiply by 57 degree.
The factor of 57 is the approximate conversion factor between degrees and radians. (57 degrees/radian).
 
Okay thanks I did 57 x (1.5/13000) and got .0066 degrees which was correct. Thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top