Angular velocity of a rod - Help

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular acceleration of a rod with attached masses and determining the angle at which its angular velocity is maximized. The user has successfully derived the equation for angular acceleration but is uncertain about the conditions for maximum angular velocity. It is suggested that maximum angular velocity occurs when the rod is vertical, as potential energy is minimized at this point. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding torque and energy conservation in the context of rotational motion. The user seeks confirmation of their reasoning regarding the vertical position and its relationship to angular velocity.
flower76
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
I have figured out the first part regarding the equation, but I don't really know what to write for the second part. Intuitively I think the rod would swing down, because m1 is heavier, and it would have the greatest velocity when vertical. But I have no idea if I'm right, and if I am I can't give reasons why.

The question:

A rigid rod of mass M and length I, with masses m1 and m2 attached at the end of the rod, can rotate in a vertical plane about a frictionless pivot through its centre. At time t=0, the rod is held at an angle theta, as shown. Show that if the system is let go, the angular acceleration of the rod at t=0 is:

\alpha=\frac{2(m1-m2)gcos\theta}{L(M/3+m1+m2)}

If m1>m2, for what value of \theta is the angular velocity \omega a maximum? Give reasons for your answer.

The diagram shown has a rod at about a 45 degree angle north east with m1 the mass on the bottom.


Help is much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume you know the formula:

\tau = I \alpha

where \tau is the torque, I is the moment of inertia around the axis and \alpha = d\omega/dt = d^2\theta/dt^2 is the angular acceleration.

The moment of inertia of the rod is 1/12 M L^2, so:

I = 1/12 M L^2 + m_1 (L/2)^2 + m_2 (L/2)^2

and the torque due to the gravitational force is the sum of the torques on both mass m1 and m2, but one of them with a minus sine because they point in opposite directions.

Concerning the other question: In this case total energy is conserved and kinetic energy is proportional to \omega^2, so what can you say about the potential energy when \omega is maximal?
 
So when angular velocity is at a maximum, potential energy will be at a minimum, meaning that the rod will be vertical??

Is this correct?
 
Ill give you a hand anf give you a head start on the first question. To prrove the angular acceleration.
First, draw a free body diagram of the situation. You will see that the sum of the torque about the centre point is:
\Sigma \tau = \frac{L}{2} cos \theta m_{1} g - \frac{L}{2} cos \theta m_{2} g

we can factor out a term:

\Sigma \tau = \frac{L}{2} cos \theta g (m_1 - m_2)

now, we alson know that:
\Sigma \tau = I\alpha

the moment of inertia for the system is the sum of all of the moments of inertia.
\Sigma I = I_{rod} + I_{m_1} + I_{m_2}

\Sigma I = \frac{1}{12}ML^2 + m_1 (\frac{L}{2})^2 + m_2 (\frac{L}{2})^2

\Sigma I = \frac{1}{12}ML^2 + m_1 \frac{L^2}{4} + m_2 \frac{L^2}{4}

\Sigma I = \frac{L^2}{4} (\frac{1}{3} M + m_1 + m_2)

I think you should be able to do the rest by yourself. If you still don't understand, ask.

Regards,

Nenad
 
Last edited:
The equation part I'm ok with, but the second question is what is giving me trouble, could anyone confirm that I'm right in saying that the maximum angular velocity occurs when the rod is vertical? Or am I totally wrong?

Thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top