Angular Velocity of u Shape - Solving for Angular Velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular velocity of a "u" shaped rod that transitions from a straight configuration while rotating. Initially, the rod rotates at 9.37 rad/s about its center, and upon changing shape, it becomes a composite system with different mass distributions. Participants emphasize using the conservation of angular momentum to relate the initial and final states, specifically the equations I_1ω_1 = I_2ω_2. Key concepts include moment of inertia and net torque, which are crucial for solving the problem. The focus is on applying these principles to determine the new angular velocity after the transformation.
Kelschul
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Angular Velocity?

A thin uniform rod is rotating at an angular velocity of 9.37 rad/s about an axis that is perpendicular to the rod at its center. As the figure indicates, the rod is hinged at two places, one-quarter of the length from each end. Without the aid of external torques, the rod suddenly assumes a "u" shape, with the arms of the "u" parallel to the rotation axis. What is the angular velocity of the rotating "u"?

Before: The system is a single rod of mass M and length L rotating about an axis through its center.
After: The system consists of three parts; a rod of mass M/2 and length L/2 rotating about an axis through its center and two masses M/4 rotating at a distance L/4 from the axis. (Treat these masses as particles.)



I know I should use the conservation of momentum, moment of inerta for the rod, Net torque= Inertia x angular acceleration but I have no idea where to start!

Help me exam tomorrow!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Indeed, conservation of momentum is the way to go.
The momentum before is I_1\omega_1 and after it's I_2\omega_2.
So ask yourself what's given, what can you calculate and what is the unknown?
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

System of two wheels of different sizes with an axle through their centers
2
Replies
67
Views
4K
Find velocities when a mass leaves a system of a rod with two masses
Replies
10
Views
2K
Angular momentum for a bullet and a rod attached to a ceiling
Replies
17
Views
1K
Angular Momentum- Conserved or not?
Replies
17
Views
353
Change in Angular Velocity While Orbiting With No Torque
Replies
30
Views
3K
Existential dilemma on angular velocity of a complex rigid body
Replies
25
Views
2K
How Does Angular Momentum Conservation Affect Asteroid Collision Dynamics?
7
Replies
335
Views
13K
Conservation of angular momentum
Replies
22
Views
3K
Angular Momentum Problem: Mouse walking on a rotating turntable
Replies
5
Views
1K
Linear and angular momentum problem: Ball hitting a rod
2
Replies
62
Views
12K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top