Another Angular Acceleration Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the torque exerted on a CD that accelerates uniformly from rest to 450 rev/min over 3.0 revolutions. The initial calculations using the formula tau = I * alpha were attempted, but the user encountered errors in determining alpha. It was clarified that the correct approach does not involve taking the square root in the equation for alpha, which should be alpha = wf^2/(2*theta). Despite correcting this, the user still found discrepancies in their final answer compared to the expected torque value of 0.0072 N*m. The conversation highlights confusion over the calculations and the possibility of an incorrect provided answer.
jbgibson
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
The problem states: when the play button is pressed, a CD accelerates uniformly from rest to 450 rev/min in 3.0 revolutions. If the CD has a radius of 6.0-cm and a mass of 17-g, what is the torque exerted on it?

I used the the forumla tau = I * alpha; I = .5(0.017)(0.06)^2 = 3.06E-5;
in order to calculate alpha, I used wf^2 = wo^2+2alpha(theta); from this I get alpha = square root (wf^2)/(2*theta). I realize some converting is necessary so I convert 450 rev/min into 47.124 rad/s, and 3.0 revolutions into 18.50 rad. Applying these figures to solve for alpha, I get 60.018 rad/s^2. Finally, tau = I*alpha = 0.00184 N*m.

This is incorrect. Can someone direct me in the right direction? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have two equations, omega = alpha * t, and fi = ½ * alpha * t^2, these equations are like v = at and s = ½at^2 in linear motion. You also have two unkwons, so you can solve both.

Then use M = J*alpha.
 
alpha = wf^2/(2 theta) , no sqrt.
you see Work and Energy hiding in this kinematic equation?
 
lightgrav said:
alpha = wf^2/(2 theta) , no sqrt.
you see Work and Energy hiding in this kinematic equation?

I still don't have a clue where to go with this. I was in error, there is no sqrt., but the solution I'm getting is incorrect. The answer to this problem is 0.0072-N*m. How is that? What am I doing wrong?
 
I get the same answer as you. Maybe the given answer is incorrect.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top