Another simple harmonic motion problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a simple harmonic motion (SHM) problem involving an object with a period of 0.9 seconds and an amplitude of 0.32 meters. The first part of the problem, calculating the time taken to move from 0.32 m to 0.16 m, was successfully solved, yielding a time of 0.15 seconds. The confusion arises in the second part, where the user struggles to determine the phase angle when starting from 0.16 m instead of the initial position. It is noted that moving from 0.32 m to 0 m represents a quarter of a cycle, which aids in understanding the time calculation for the second part. Overall, the discussion highlights the challenges in applying phase angles in SHM calculations.
bdh2991
Messages
102
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object is undergoing SHM with period 0.9 s and amplitude 0.32 m. At t=0, the object is at x=0.32 m and is instantaneously at rest. Calculate the time it takes the object to go from 0.32 m to 0.16 m, and to go from 0.16m to 0 m.


Homework Equations


x=Acos(wt+θ)
f=1/T
w=2∏f



The Attempt at a Solution



I completely understood the first part of the problem when going from x= .32 to x= .16. using the formulas to come up with the angular frequency and then just solving for t, in which i got the answer t= 0.15 s.

I'm confused about the second part because it isn't starting from t=0. I was thinking that the only difference in the formula would be the phase angle, i just don't understand how to come up with that. i thought that the phase angle is the angle in which x is at the position you are starting at, if you start at a position .16 m with an unknown t-value, how do you know what the phase angle is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I also got 0.15s for the first part.
To go from 0.32 to 0 is 1/4 of a cycle. I used this to calculate the time to go from 0.16 to 0
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top