Another Understanding question (not homework)

  • Thread starter Thread starter quickslant
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homework
AI Thread Summary
The discovery of elementary particles is closely linked to advancements in particle accelerator technology because breaking apart larger particles requires significant energy. As fundamental particles have high binding energies, larger accelerators are necessary to achieve the collision energies needed for their production. Understanding the rest mass of these particles further illustrates the energy requirements for their creation. The discussion highlights the importance of technological progress in enabling these scientific discoveries. Overall, advancements in particle accelerators have been crucial for exploring the fundamental components of matter.
quickslant
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
Another comprehension question is for me to understand why the discovery of elementary (fundamental) particles depended on advances in particle accelerator technology?

Can somone explain this to me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you might want to read a brief history of time by hawking. it goes into detail about particle acceleration and other things. i just read it myself but barely understood anything.

-Amy
 
I think that the simple answer is that you generally have to break things apart to find what they are made of. And the binding energies of smaller, more fundamental particles are large enough, that it takes bigger and bigger accelerators to reach those collision energies.
 
lol.. i figured it out.. thanks..
 
Huge energies (accelerations) are required to produce these particles. You might want to look at the rest mass of some of the fundamental particles
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top