Answer Moment of Inertia: Doubling Mass, Adding Weight to Stick

AI Thread Summary
Doubling the mass of a weight results in a doubled moment of inertia, confirming the initial assessment. Adding an equal weight to the center of the stick does not affect the moment of inertia since it is positioned at the axis of rotation. However, adding a weight four times the original mass at the center also does not change the moment of inertia for the same reason. When using a stick with mass, the moment of inertia increases and requires a different calculation than the simple point mass formula, as it involves integrating over the mass distribution of the stick. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately calculating moment of inertia in various scenarios.
twiztidmxcn
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Moment of inertia time in physics, hard as hell concept, but here's the question:

You swing a small, heavy weight on the end of a light stick (the stick is light enough you can neglect its moment of inertia, and you can consider the weight as a point mass). Remember that the moment of inertia is a measure of how an object resists angular acceleration. How would the following actions effect the moment of inertia of what you are swinging

A) doubling mass of weight
B) adding an equal weight to the first at the center of the stick
C) adding a weight that is 4 times the original mass to the center
D) using a stick that isn't light, but weighs as much as the original weight on the end

so, I am using the equation I = mr^2, for A i got that if you double the mass, the moment of inertia is doubled as well. for B i believe that if you add a weight to the center of the stick, it shouldn't really affect it because it is not a distance away from the axis of rotation, same thing with C. For D i put that the moment of inertia increases because you get mass stick * r^2 + mass weight * r^2.

Is what I am saying here right? I think A and D are right but I am quite unsure of B and C, any help would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
twiztidmxcn said:
Moment of inertia time in physics, hard as hell concept, but here's the question:

You swing a small, heavy weight on the end of a light stick (the stick is light enough you can neglect its moment of inertia, and you can consider the weight as a point mass). Remember that the moment of inertia is a measure of how an object resists angular acceleration. How would the following actions effect the moment of inertia of what you are swinging

A) doubling mass of weight
B) adding an equal weight to the first at the center of the stick
C) adding a weight that is 4 times the original mass to the center
D) using a stick that isn't light, but weighs as much as the original weight on the end

so, I am using the equation I = mr^2, for A i got that if you double the mass, the moment of inertia is doubled as well. for B i believe that if you add a weight to the center of the stick, it shouldn't really affect it because it is not a distance away from the axis of rotation, same thing with C. For D i put that the moment of inertia increases because you get mass stick * r^2 + mass weight * r^2.

Is what I am saying here right? I think A and D are right but I am quite unsure of B and C, any help would be appreciated

For A) your answer is correct.

For B) and C) : the implication from the question is that you're grabbing the stick by one end and swinging the mass from the other end. If you add the mass to the center of the stick, you're adding it midway between the original mass and the axis of rotation. Can you figure out the correct expressions now ?

For D) you need to know that for more complex masses than point masses situated at a certain distance from an axis, the expression for the moment of inertia is not simply mr^2. For a uniform thin rod, the moment of inertia about the end is I = \frac{1}{3}mr^2, where r is the length of the rod (and the radius of the rotation). (To prove that you can use simple calculus). Now figure out the total moment of inertia of the rod-mass combination.
 
Just some extra insight on that last idea:

The same fundamental principle applies: you are still multiplying each point mass by the square of its distance from the axis. The difference for an object that is not itself a point mass is that now you have a collection of infinitely small point masses of infinite number. We express the moment of inertia (the infinite sum of all the moments of inertia of these theoretical point masses that make up the object) as a continuous distribution using the integration over the mass:

I=\sum_{i}{r_{i}^{2}m_{i}}=\int_{m}{r^{2}}\,dm

This general expression is then used to develop the specific equations for moments of inertia of different objects.
 
thank you both for your help
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top