Answering "How to Understand Approximation in QM

Tspirit
Messages
50
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


In the Griffiths book <Introduction to QM>, Section 2.3.2: Analytic method (for The harmonic oscillator), there is an equation (##\xi## is very large)
$$h(\xi)\approx C\sum\frac{1}{(j/2)!}\xi^{j}\approx C\sum\frac{1}{(j)!}\xi^{2j}\approx Ce^{\xi^{2}}.$$
How to understand the meaning of the third approximately equal sign?

Homework Equations


I know the Taylor series
$$e^{x}=\frac{x^{n}}{n!}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


If take place of ##\xi## with ##2\xi##, the equation may hold. However, can it be like this? What is the series of ##e^{\xi^{2}}## in real? I don't want the approximation. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the sum runs from j=0 to infinity, it is not an approximation, it is exact. It is the Taylor series of ##e^x## with ##x=\xi^2##.

Note that ##\xi^{2j} = (\xi^2)^j##.
 
mfb said:
If the sum runs from j=0 to infinity, it is not an approximation, it is exact. It is the Taylor series of ##e^x## with ##x=\xi^2##.

Note that ##\xi^{2j} = (\xi^2)^j##.
Thank you! I have found the problem I met. In fact, I want to prove the following equation $$e^{x^{2}}=\sum\frac{x^{2n}}{n!},$$ but didn't succeed at first. Now I can. This is the process.
Adopting the Taylor expansion of the left, with the derivertives
$$ (e^{x^{2}})^{(0)}=e^{x^{2}},(e^{x^{2}})^{(1)}=e^{x^{2}}2x,(e^{x^{2}})^{(2)}=e^{x^{2}}(4x^{2}+2),(e^{x^{2}})^{(3)}=e^{x^{2}}(8x^{3}+12x),(e^{x^{2}})^{(4)}=e^{x^{2}}(16x^{4}+48x^{2}+12) ...,$$
$$e^{x^{2}}=1+0+2x^{2}/{2!}+0+12x^{4}/{4!}+...,$$ which is exactly equal to the right expression $$1+x^2/(1!)+x^4/(2!).$$
Actually, the zero terms in the Taylor expansion stopped me from calculating continuously in the beginning, making me think they are not equal.
 
That is more complicated, but it works as well.
 
Tspirit said:
Thank you! I have found the problem I met. In fact, I want to prove the following equation $$e^{x^{2}}=\sum\frac{x^{2n}}{n!},$$ but didn't succeed at first. Now I can. This is the process.
Adopting the Taylor expansion of the left, with the derivertives
$$ (e^{x^{2}})^{(0)}=e^{x^{2}},(e^{x^{2}})^{(1)}=e^{x^{2}}2x,(e^{x^{2}})^{(2)}=e^{x^{2}}(4x^{2}+2),(e^{x^{2}})^{(3)}=e^{x^{2}}(8x^{3}+12x),(e^{x^{2}})^{(4)}=e^{x^{2}}(16x^{4}+48x^{2}+12) ...,$$
$$e^{x^{2}}=1+0+2x^{2}/{2!}+0+12x^{4}/{4!}+...,$$ which is exactly equal to the right expression $$1+x^2/(1!)+x^4/(2!).$$
Actually, the zero terms in the Taylor expansion stopped me from calculating continuously in the beginning, making me think they are not equal.

You could simply let ##y = x^2##, then:

##e^y = \sum\frac{y^{n}}{n!}##

And

##e^{x^2} = \sum\frac{(x^2)^{n}}{n!} = \sum\frac{x^{2n}}{n!}##

In fact, you don't really need to introduce the intermediate variable ##y##. You can simply write down this last equation directly.
 
PeroK said:
You could simply let ##y = x^2##, then:

##e^y = \sum\frac{y^{n}}{n!}##

And

##e^{x^2} = \sum\frac{(x^2)^{n}}{n!} = \sum\frac{x^{2n}}{n!}##

In fact, you don't really need to introduce the intermediate variable ##y##. You can simply write down this last equation directly.
Indeed, it's a simpler method.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top