Analysis Answers to questions from the book: Real Analysis by Stein

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around self-study in Measure Theory using the book "Real Analysis" by Stein and Shakarchi. One participant seeks answers to exercises in Chapter 1, expressing that existing online resources do not cover all the exercises, particularly those requiring proofs. The conversation highlights differing views on the appropriateness of seeking solutions. One perspective emphasizes the importance of grappling with problems independently to strengthen understanding, suggesting that reliance on solutions can hinder learning. Conversely, another viewpoint acknowledges the challenges of certain problems and suggests that it is acceptable to consult solutions after making a genuine effort. The discussion also notes that not all problems are equally valuable for learning, advising a strategic approach to problem-solving and solution-seeking based on the potential insights gained.
the_dane
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hi

I am trying to teach myself Measure Theory and I am using the book: Real Analysis by Stein and Skakarchi from Princeton.
I want to check if my answers to the questions are correct, so I am asking: Does anyone have the answers to the questions in chapter 1 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Velkom Dane :welcome:

You did google "stein real analysis solutions" I suppose ? And want more than I found e.g. here ?
 
BvU said:
Velkom Dane :welcome:

You did google "stein real analysis solutions" I suppose ? And want more than I found e.g. here ?

Hi.
Thank you for your help. Yes I did find this one. Not every exercise is on that link, and I wanted to do those exercises which is about proving some claims, and there is not many of those on that link. That's why I asked in here.

Thanks though
 
It is better to actually think of the material, then finding solutions. The more you start thinking and solving things, albeit they may be small or insignificant, is one more time your brain grows stronger. If you need solutions for Analysis, then you are doing it wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
MidgetDwarf said:
It is better to actually think of the material, then finding solutions. The more you start thinking and solving things, albeit they may be small or insignificant, is one more time your brain grows stronger. If you need solutions for Analysis, then you are doing it wrong.

I don't know about this. Sure, ideally it would be good to solve all problems of an analysis book yourself without any help. But you only have so much time. And some problems are really tricky. So I'd say that if you searched for a solution for some time, it is ok to look a bit at the solutions.

Sure, it's not good to look at the solutions of all the problems. If you can't solve a single problem, then something is wrong. But if you have a tough problem that requires some ingenious trick that you just can't find, then I'd say look at the solution. Just be sure to actually put some effort in the problem before looking at the solution. That is the important part.
 
micromass said:
I don't know about this. Sure, ideally it would be good to solve all problems of an analysis book yourself without any help. But you only have so much time. And some problems are really tricky. So I'd say that if you searched for a solution for some time, it is ok to look a bit at the solutions.

Sure, it's not good to look at the solutions of all the problems. If you can't solve a single problem, then something is wrong. But if you have a tough problem that requires some ingenious trick that you just can't find, then I'd say look at the solution. Just be sure to actually put some effort in the problem before looking at the solution. That is the important part.

Add to this that not all problems are created equal. And then I'm not talking about how difficult it is to solve. I'm talking about that you will gain more out of one problem than the other. There might be very difficult problems which are just a waste of time because they don't get you any cool intuition or problem solving tool. Or there might be very easy problems which actually can cause a big landslide in your worldview. This is something to keep in mind when deciding how much time you spend on a problem and when to look at the solution.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top