ANSYS Static Structural boundary constraints issues

AI Thread Summary
The user is struggling with boundary constraints in ANSYS while modeling a pipe clamped by two gripping blocks, experiencing issues where the blocks seem to vanish during the solution process. Suggestions from other users emphasize the importance of refining the mesh, particularly at the contact interface, to ensure proper recognition of components. They also recommend applying additional restraints to prevent unwanted movement of the blocks and pipe, leveraging symmetry to determine effective restraint placements. The user plans to refine the mesh further and explore different restraint settings to resolve the issue. Continued experimentation and adjustments are necessary for successful analysis.
MechE88
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

First off, I'd like to mention that I am completely unfamiliar with this ANSYS and have been fighting with this program for last 2 and half weeks. Any feedback and help is greatly appreciated! Please refer to the photos attached for referral.

My project currently involves analyzing the stresses and deformation occurring on the gripping blocks as well as the piece of pipe. Basically what I'm trying to model is a piece of pipe being clamped by two blocks. The blocks have a profile on them that grip the pipe. The pipe is clamped by equal and opposite forces being applied on each block.

Under connections->contacts, I have frictionless contacts between the face of the pipe (target) and the profile of the gripping blocks (contact).

As for meshing, I'm currently just doing a very coarse test to see if the analysis works. I'm not sure if this is a good method but to save time I am doing this method for now.

I have forces applied onto the blocks as well as frictionless supports for where I cut it in half (due to symmetry)My problem is that when I solve for it, the blocks vanish as if its not there. I hope this is a simple fix and I'm just missing something very simple.I apologize if I missed out on a lot of crucial information. Please feel free to ask anything I may have missed out on that would aid in my situation and I will respond ASAP.
 

Attachments

  • Body1.JPG
    Body1.JPG
    20.1 KB · Views: 765
  • body2.JPG
    body2.JPG
    15.9 KB · Views: 755
  • sidebar1.JPG
    sidebar1.JPG
    34 KB · Views: 698
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
MechE88 said:
Hey all,

First off, I'd like to mention that I am completely unfamiliar with this ANSYS and have been fighting with this program for last 2 and half weeks. Any feedback and help is greatly appreciated! Please refer to the photos attached for referral.

My project currently involves analyzing the stresses and deformation occurring on the gripping blocks as well as the piece of pipe. Basically what I'm trying to model is a piece of pipe being clamped by two blocks. The blocks have a profile on them that grip the pipe. The pipe is clamped by equal and opposite forces being applied on each block.

Under connections->contacts, I have frictionless contacts between the face of the pipe (target) and the profile of the gripping blocks (contact).

As for meshing, I'm currently just doing a very coarse test to see if the analysis works. I'm not sure if this is a good method but to save time I am doing this method for now.

I have forces applied onto the blocks as well as frictionless supports for where I cut it in half (due to symmetry)


My problem is that when I solve for it, the blocks vanish as if its not there. I hope this is a simple fix and I'm just missing something very simple.


I apologize if I missed out on a lot of crucial information. Please feel free to ask anything I may have missed out on that would aid in my situation and I will respond ASAP.

If the mesh for the contact interface is course then Ansys might not recognise the components and hence will fly off into space.
Also if the contact is initially closed but there is a large gap between the mating components then the components will pass through each other. Check your contact settings.
SO consider refining the mesh
 
If your model is geometrically "perfect" and the contacts are all frictionless, then the pipe can slide out of the blocks and rotate about its axis inside the blocks. The two blocks can probably slide around relative to each other as well.

You need to apply some restraints to stop things like that from happening.

If you set up the model correctly, you will get no reaction forces at these additional restraints, so they won't affect the results.

You can use ideas about symmetry to choose the restraints. For example the plane cutting the length of the pipe into two halves will not move along the length of the pipe (by symmetry, there is no reason why it should move in one direction rather than in the opposite direction) and it won't rotate about the axis of the pipe.
 
Thank you Bugatti and AlephZero for your help. I will go ahead right now and solve for it using my full mesh count. I've refined it using size meshing on the blocks profile as well as the face of the pipe. Element size is at 0.0155 inch.

As for the restraints you suggested Aleph, I'm not entierly sure what else I can do. I've played around with the settings and all that for more than a week no to no avail. Will keep trying different things though!
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top