- #1
lucas_
- 413
- 23
Can you transmit em wave with antenna much smaller than its wavelength? For example. ELF antenna is very long. Can you make one small enough to fit in the pocket by the device constructing the long wavelength part by part?
You can, but the power transmitted by the antenna in that wavelength range would be minuscule.lucas_ said:Can you transmit em wave with antenna much smaller than its wavelength?
Drakkith said:You can, but the power transmitted by the antenna in that wavelength range would be minuscule.
Just have your transmitter set to the frequency you want to transmit on. If it goes low enough you can transmit on any frequency you desire. But like I said, you'll run into the issue that you're transmitting so little power that you can't detect the transmission. Especially if your receiving antenna is also very small compared to the carrier wave wavelength.lucas_ said:How does one do that?
Drakkith said:Just have your transmitter set to the frequency you want to transmit on. If it goes low enough you can transmit on any frequency you desire. But like I said, you'll run into the issue that you're transmitting so little power that you can't detect the transmission. Especially if your receiving antenna is also very small compared to the carrier wave wavelength.
lucas_ said:Can you transmit em wave with antenna much smaller than its wavelength? For example. ELF antenna is very long. Can you make one small enough to fit in the pocket by the device constructing the long wavelength part by part?
lucas_ said:Any illustrations? This works for cell phones too, for example, one the size of a matchbox only with equally tiny antenna?
Here's a related thread that may also help:lucas_ said:Can you transmit em wave with antenna much smaller than its wavelength? For example. ELF antenna is very long. Can you make one small enough to fit in the pocket by the device constructing the long wavelength part by part?
lucas_ said:Can he send a frequency that uses the antenna of normal size cellphone?
lucas_ said:What should he do to send a radio if he has ant level labs too?
Drakkith said:Yes, but not very well. The signal would be extremely weak.
It's easy. If the antenna is significantly smaller than the wavelength of the signal, then the power radiated will be very weak. Cell phone signals are roughly a few hundred centimeters in wavelength, so if the antenna is less than about a quarter of that size it won't be able to efficiently transmit the signal.
lucas_ said:In short. Ant man won't be able to send any radio signal no matter how advanced is his technology at his Ant size labs. And the best he could do is use paper and walk on it with shoes of ink (in other words, just writing)?
Drakkith said:Well, he could simply transmit at a higher frequency. A 20 GHz signal would have a wavelength of about 1.5 cm, and an efficient antenna could be 1/4 that size, or about 3-4 mm. A 40 GHz signal would need an antenna of about 1.5-2 mm, and an 80 GHz signal would need an antenna about 0.75-1 mm long.
lucas_ said:Brilliant. Let us say he further decreased the size to Planck scale (in one of his movies and and let's ignore the quantum rules for now). What is the frequency and wavelength corresponding to the Planck scale antenna. If this signal was transmitted and you are one foot away from it
lucas_ said:Can the signal hurt you?
Drakkith said:A Planck scale antenna would need to transmit in the far gamma-ray range to be efficient and you essentially cease to have a communications antenna as we know it.
Yes, gamma rays can hurt you.
NO, it's dangerouslucas_ said:Is it due to lack of power?
lucas_ said:Why can't you transmit using higher frequency ionizing waves (like x-ray) that with similar all around reach like radio waves?
You could send them out, but they would be gamma rays, not radio waves.lucas_ said:But if there was sufficient source of power, could you send gamma waves as radio waves to the surrounding?
davenn said:NO, it's dangerous
lucas_ said:Why is that in x-rays, the electrons moving up and down in tinier antenna doesn't transmit x-ray waves in all directions.
Drakkith said:You can't really make electrons oscillate back and forth that quickly. The frequency is simply too high.
Drakkith said:You can. You just can't encode or receive receive information from them like you can with radio and microwaves. At such high frequencies the wave oscillates too quickly for electronics to use as a carrier wave. You would be forced to do something more like Morse code, where the radiation is pulsed on and off and information is encoded in the pattern of on-offs.You could send them out, but they would be gamma rays, not radio waves.
lucas_ said:What is the maximum frequency where you can still move the electrons back and forth in the antenna?
lucas_ said:You mentioned here it was possible to send gamma rays like radio waves in antenna to the surrounding (I assumed in circles), but in comment one message later you said it was not possible "You can't really make electrons oscillate back and forth that quickly. The frequency is simply too high.". Kindly clarify what is the case. Thank you!
Drakkith said:I believe it is somewhere in the far IR range. I'm not sure of the exact frequency.
You can send out gamma rays into the surrounding environment, just like you can do with radio waves. The fundamental principles behind their propagation are identical since they are both EM waves. The difference is in how they are generated. You can't generate gamma rays by oscillating electrons back and forth, so you can't generate them with a conventional antenna. You need something like nuclear decay.
lucas_ said:So this is the reason why visible light can't be emitted by antenna?
no exception?
lucas_ said:How about chest x-ray machine. How do they direct the x-ray? nuclear decay since antenna not possible?
In what would be called "conventional" antenna, say, a dipole of tube, wire or PCB track, the frequencylucas_ said:What is the maximum frequency where you can still move the electrons back and forth in the antenna?
It all depends on the type of antenna in question; not all antennae are dipoles. A (slightly less than)quarter wave monopole on a big ground plane or a (slightly less than) half wave dipole is easy to 'match' the output of a transmitter to. The process of radiating energy into space from an antenna presents itself as a Resistance (the only way that RF energy can actually be transferred). This resistance is about 377Ω and, just as you need to match any AC source to a load, to launch power efficiently, you need a 'Matching Transformer' of some sort. A half wave dipole is just one structure that acts like the right transformer and gives you a pure resistance of 73Ω at one frequency (it resonates at this particular length so there is no Reactance involved. The 73Ω is called the Radiation Resistance. At other frequencies there are extra Reactance components and the 73Ω goes down and down as the antenna is shorter. This reduction is pretty extreme and soon the resistance of the antenna and feeder structure becomes relevant (like high resistance mains leads) but there is also a big Reactive component and that can be 'tuned out' by a matching network. BUT it can only be done over a very limited bandwidth. If you really want to radiate from a small structure and if you are prepared to use a narrow bandwidth then there is no fundamental lower size limit. The BBC 200kHz Transmitting antenna at Droitwich is only 218m high for a wavelength of 1500m and it belts out 150kW [Edit not 15kW!] to cover most of the UK.davenn said:Any antenna less than a 1/4 wavelength at the frequency of interest is going to be horrifically inefficient
and as @Drakkith said, output is going to be miniscule.
sophiecentaur said:It all depends on the type of antenna in question; not all antennae are dipoles. A (slightly less than)quarter wave monopole on a big ground plane or a (slightly less than) half wave dipole is easy to 'match' the output of a transmitter to.
sophiecentaur said:The BBC 200kHz Transmitting antenna at Droitwich is only 218m high for a wavelength of 1500m and it belts out 150kW [Edit not 15kW!] to cover most of the UK.
lucas_ said:So this is the reason why visible light can't be emitted by antenna?
no exception?
View attachment 246298How about chest x-ray machine. How do they direct the x-ray? nuclear decay since antenna not possible?
And expensive.davenn said:NO, it's dangerous
And a massive amount of copper in the ground mat, of course. That would count as the antenna, I suppose.davenn said:A little matching will do the trick
Ha ha! He's ready to learn about scaling.lucas_ said:My nephew was asking me last week whether if Antman was the size of Ant. He could still send radio waves in his radio or cell phone.
The length of an antenna is directly related to the wavelength of an EM wave. As a rule of thumb, the length of an antenna should be approximately equal to one-quarter or one-half of the wavelength of the EM wave it is designed to receive or transmit. This ensures maximum efficiency and proper resonance between the antenna and the EM wave.
Yes, the length of an antenna can be adjusted to receive different frequencies of EM waves. By changing the length of the antenna, it changes the resonant frequency at which it operates. This allows the antenna to receive a wider range of frequencies.
The length of an antenna can affect the directionality of an EM wave. Longer antennas tend to have a narrower beamwidth, meaning they are more directional. Shorter antennas have a wider beamwidth, making them less directional. This is due to the wavelength of the EM wave being longer for longer antennas, causing it to be more directional.
There is no one ideal length for an antenna to receive or transmit EM waves. The length of an antenna will vary depending on the frequency of the EM wave it is designed for. However, as mentioned before, a quarter or half-wavelength antenna is generally considered to be the most efficient for a specific frequency.
Yes, the length of an antenna can affect the strength of the received signal. As the length of the antenna increases, so does the gain of the antenna, meaning it can receive weaker signals. However, there is a limit to this, as excessively long antennas can also cause signal distortion and interference. It is important to find the right balance between antenna length and signal strength for optimal performance.